Biden and the Courts

Should there be term limits?

  • No

    Votes: 3 25.0%
  • Yes - 8

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes - 12 years

    Votes: 1 8.3%
  • Yes - 16 years

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes 18 years

    Votes: 3 25.0%
  • Yes 20 years

    Votes: 4 33.3%
  • Yes 24 years

    Votes: 1 8.3%

  • Total voters
    12
And the Republicans are trying to make sure the Dems never get to the White House again, too.


Except that isn't true at all.

It's just that one side is trying to do it while keeping something resembling a moral compass.


I'm not sure which side that would be, the spineless slugs know as Republicans or the side who is led by a guy who is owned by China.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
And the Republicans are trying to make sure the Dems never get to the White House again, too.


Except that isn't true at all.


Of course it's true. Just like Nebraska is trying to make sure our opponent never scores a touchdown.

There's no correct world view where Republicans are OK with Democrats holding the White House. The problem is, they see their support base shrinking and they see most of their electorate aging out of existence in the next 10-20 years, so they're trying to rig the system.

 
You can actually only complain about one seat being “stolen”. Not two.  If you are for Garland being seated than you need to be for Barrett being seated also 
Wrong - they actively changed the rules and negated precedent twice. With Garland, they violated old precedent to create new- then with Barret- the negated their own new precedent to revert to the old. Both are d!(k moves and both illustrate the lack of character, morals, and a sense of fair play of the right. 

I attended a renaissance fair once. During the jousting competition the black knights motto was "Cheat to win," that motto has been embraced by the right tenfold.   

 
Wrong - they actively changed the rules and negated precedent twice. With Garland, they violated old precedent to create new- then with Barret- the negated their own new precedent to revert to the old. Both are d!(k moves and both illustrate the lack of character, morals, and a sense of fair play of the right. 

I attended a renaissance fair once. During the jousting competition the black knights motto was "Cheat to win," that motto has been embraced by the right tenfold.   


That's rich considering all of the shenanigans during the last Presidential election, including many states unconstitutionally changing election laws and mailing out ballots to people that were either dead or who no longer resided in at the address in which they were registered.

 
Wrong - they actively changed the rules and negated precedent twice. With Garland, they violated old precedent to create new- then with Barret- the negated their own new precedent to revert to the old. Both are d!(k moves and both illustrate the lack of character, morals, and a sense of fair play of the right. 

I attended a renaissance fair once. During the jousting competition the black knights motto was "Cheat to win," that motto has been embraced by the right tenfold.   
Wrong.  

 
Sory, my bad.
c20a2221cc2eda66004be6e80a704bd5.png


 
Back
Top