Grant of Rights. Basically its a way to kill expansion, but if a team wanted out badly enough they could do it, it would just end up costing them.
Though we don't know what that cost would be, since no one has challenged them yet, and potential damages would be hard for the conference being left to establish if their media contracts continue to pay the same amount, regardless of the number of teams.
The way i understood GOR was that the remaining teams of the conference would have to stay intact and then prove that there would be a loss of $ with a team leaving the conference.
But if several leave and the league dissolves, then there is no basis for the GOR
Yes, it's assumed that there has to be a conference around to enforce the GOR. But three teams leaving the Big XII won't dissolve the conference, so the question becomes, what reasonable damages could be sought if the Big XII continues to receive the same amount of TV money, regardless if Texass, OU, and/or Kansas are no longer in the conference?
Another B12 bashing article by OU's beat writer. Wonder if OU admin is promoting any of this to Trammel to lay the groundwork for OU's move announcement?
http://newsok.com/big-12-expansion-why-nebraska-missouri-and-am-arent-returning-to-the-land-of-the-longhorn-network/article/5438498/?page=2
Yup. See post above where Frank the Tank pointed out other Trammel articles, that Chip Brown is getting in on the action and suggesting something is happening, and that Fox Sports walked back comments supporting OU/KU to the B1G. There's smoke to this fire.
There is nothing wrong with Texas if they can be reigned in. And the B1G is the conference that can do that.
I bet they would even part ways with LHN.
Texas will not part ways with the LHN. If anything, Texass is going to sit on the LHN to force ESPN to cut bait and take the buyout to save Disney money. If Texass drops the LHN, they're walking away from a huge potential payday that should happen any time now (see Disney and ESPN financials, cord-cutters impacting television revenue, etc.)
And StPaulHusker is right--there's nothing wrong with Texass, provided Delaney can reign them in. And considering there are bigger fish in the conference (e.g. Michigan, tOSU) politically-speaking, Texass is likely to not get their way.
Plus, the lure of opening up Texass to the B1G is too much to pass up if it's legitimately on the table. Imagine moving the B1G Title Game to the Jerry Dome--it would get a lot more positive press and buildup compared to the Indianapolis joint.
And frankly, I don't see Texass returning to any semblance of long-term dominance with the whole of the B1G and SEC now in their backyard.