:yeah :yeah :yeahi would say he needs to prove he can win at least another year after this once a lot of the hawkins built players are no longer starters.. see how he coaches and builds the players
Valid point, he is un-proven.:yeah :yeah :yeahi would say he needs to prove he can win at least another year after this once a lot of the hawkins built players are no longer starters.. see how he coaches and builds the players
His bio only confirms my first thought, which is that he needs to show that he can do it on his own. Don't get me wrong, he did a good job leading Boise St. last year, but he inherited a very good team. If he's doing the same thing in five years, then he can be considered for big HC jobs. Not yet.
yes, yes they did.Did'nt he have a little problem of beating Nevada this year? Seems to me he can't find a DC either and your whole game plan cannot be gadgets plays.
That's fair criticism of Pelini and Gill, but you can't only say about Paul Johnson that he's from a service academy. He has a lot of proven HC experience. All the guy has done is win everywhere he's gone,Valid point, he is un-proven.:yeah :yeah :yeahi would say he needs to prove he can win at least another year after this once a lot of the hawkins built players are no longer starters.. see how he coaches and builds the players
His bio only confirms my first thought, which is that he needs to show that he can do it on his own. Don't get me wrong, he did a good job leading Boise St. last year, but he inherited a very good team. If he's doing the same thing in five years, then he can be considered for big HC jobs. Not yet.
But the general consensus around here is 1 candidate with 1 game experience as a HC.
Another with two years in the MAC
and the third is from a service academy
??????????????????????????????????????