B.B. Hemingway
Donor
Ya... I'm kinda thinking we need them to lose out. Which sucks 'cause then beating them won't look as good, heh.
What if the B1G were to get..... 6 teams in?!?!
Ya... I'm kinda thinking we need them to lose out. Which sucks 'cause then beating them won't look as good, heh.
What if the B1G were to get..... 6 teams in?!?!
More great points. I hope you’re on the committee, or they read HB.
- Our double-digit Minnesota win doesn't get enough respect when they were #14 in the country with Reggie Lynch. They clearly aren't the same team without him since he was expelled
- We are 2-1 against ranked teams at home, both of them double digit wins. Kansas by basically a last second shot loss
Having Purdue, Mich St, and Ohio St on the road and neither back at home sucked this year in regards to our schedule. We can finish 16-3 -- no way can someone tell me we aren't deserving if that happens.
Where Dirk's column is misleading and doesn't give you the entire story is this: Dirk says that the non-conference SOS is a "prominent tool" in tournament selection. This is ABSOLUTELY incorrect. Non-conference SOS is not a predominant tool in selections.
To speak to Nebraska's non-conference schedule, the committee will discuss not only that they played Kansas, Creighton, St. John's, Central Florida, Boston College, Long Beach State, North Texas, UTSA, etc., it will also discuss the location of those games, and the specifics of each game (one possession games against Kansas and Creighton, a UCF team that has been decimated by injuries, and teams like Long Beach State, North Texas and UTSA that traditionally have been good in their respective conferences).
In Nebraska's case specifically, the committee will also discuss the first Minnesota game where Minnesota was closer to full strength, and the fact that Nebraska played Michigan State, Purdue and Ohio State only on the road. The committee will also discuss the transformation of the Nebraska team from the beginning of the year to the end of the year.
We also need to talk about losses. While we refer to 1st and 2nd quadrant wins, we also need to refer to losses (or lack of losses) in the 3rd and 4th quadrants. Winning the games you are supposed to win is more difficult in a 30+ game schedule than some might think.
Something I keep forgetting about in all of this is that we have more games other than just our last three.
I would think how we do in the conference tournament is going to play a big factor in this.
Something I keep forgetting about in all of this is that we have more games other than just our last three.
I would think how we do in the conference tournament is going to play a big factor in this.
Didn't somebody on the committee tell Boehm that if we won out (23-8) we'd be 99% in? I thought I read that somewhere on Twitter.
Good god almighty, if we win 24 games?
Has anyone in a Power Conference ever won 24 games and not been allowed in?
Most wins left out: 27 (Drexel, Oral Roberts - 2012)
... among the big six: 23 (Arizona - 2012, Mississippi St, Virginia Tech - 2010, Florida - 2009)