Nebfanatic
New member
At least we can all agree on something!This hurts. What a mistake. Special teams were a high point of the team.
The response you won't see, anywhere.
At least we can all agree on something!This hurts. What a mistake. Special teams were a high point of the team.
The response you won't see, anywhere.
He'd go to Purdue before he went down to an assistant position.Probably crazy here....I hope he calls Les Miles.
This.I truly am not sure Banker needs to go...Don't stop there! Show Banker the door
I would be in favor of trying to get Charlie Strong as a DC. It's been said numerous times that he'd be an awesome DC.Folks--Banker won't be fired unless they can line up a quality DC to replace him first...and honestly, there aren't a lot of those on the market, and I don't think we can afford to risk promoting a position coach up.
Plus, would terminating Banker impact our recruitment? I haven't kept up on our recruiting...
I for one am an advocate for this although, this got me thinking about Will Muschamp. Awesome DC at Texas, goes to be the HC at Florida, gets fired after a short tenure and then hops on to the Auburn staff as a DC for one year, not really improving their defense I might add, before bolting to SC. I do not want to hire Charlie Strong for a 1 year pit stop as a DC.I would be in favor of trying to get Charlie Strong as a DC. It's been said numerous times that he'd be an awesome DC.Folks--Banker won't be fired unless they can line up a quality DC to replace him first...and honestly, there aren't a lot of those on the market, and I don't think we can afford to risk promoting a position coach up.
Plus, would terminating Banker impact our recruitment? I haven't kept up on our recruiting...
I think Banker should go. I backed him heavily even after the OSU game, but after the Iowa game I realized something: We sh#t the bed against above average offenses, especially on the road. Ohio State's elite offense? Destroyed us. Iowa's slightly above-average offense? Destroyed us. Minnesota's decent offense? Had they not made a ton of mistakes, we would have lost. I had legit hope up to and including the Wisconsin game, because our defense performed as they should have in every one of those games, but that was all erased in the past 4 games.Banker lost a ton on the line and we will see how the defense does next year.
When your team has an average starting position of the 12 (IIRC) and you could probably let it go and guarantee your offense the 25 if it bounces.... ehhh, it's at minimum debatable.Generally speaking, no.Do you think it is smart for the punt returner to catch it at the 6 yard line? I certainly don't.
When your team is down 26-10 near the end of the third quarter and has been struggling on offense all game? I don't have a problem with it.
Yup. Put him in the million dollar coordinator club.I would be in favor of trying to get Charlie Strong as a DC. It's been said numerous times that he'd be an awesome DC.Folks--Banker won't be fired unless they can line up a quality DC to replace him first...and honestly, there aren't a lot of those on the market, and I don't think we can afford to risk promoting a position coach up.
Plus, would terminating Banker impact our recruitment? I haven't kept up on our recruiting...
But if you want great coordinators, that's a chance you have to be willing to take. You don't want to stop hiring talented people with the fear they might leave in a year.I for one am an advocate for this although, this got me thinking about Will Muschamp. Awesome DC at Texas, goes to be the HC at Florida, gets fired after a short tenure and then hops on to the Auburn staff as a DC for one year, not really improving their defense I might add, before bolting to SC. I do not want to hire Charlie Strong for a 1 year pit stop as a DC.I would be in favor of trying to get Charlie Strong as a DC. It's been said numerous times that he'd be an awesome DC.Folks--Banker won't be fired unless they can line up a quality DC to replace him first...and honestly, there aren't a lot of those on the market, and I don't think we can afford to risk promoting a position coach up.
Plus, would terminating Banker impact our recruitment? I haven't kept up on our recruiting...
yepI would take my chances with Bray. He can't be any worse and is a much better recruiter.Folks--Banker won't be fired unless they can line up a quality DC to replace him first...and honestly, there aren't a lot of those on the market, and I don't think we can afford to risk promoting a position coach up.
Plus, would terminating Banker impact our recruitment? I haven't kept up on our recruiting...
the problem is in the case of Muschamp especailly, he wasn't a great coordinator for the time they had him, then a year later they are scrambling for someone else. I'm fine if Strong comes here for a year and coaches the defense up to top 3 in our conference and then leaves. But he can just go elsewhere if we were to hire him, see no markable improvement and he leaves after a year. Not worth it imo unless he brings in the best defensive recruiting class we have ever had in his one year.But if you want great coordinators, that's a chance you have to be willing to take. You don't want to stop hiring talented people with the fear they might leave in a year.I for one am an advocate for this although, this got me thinking about Will Muschamp. Awesome DC at Texas, goes to be the HC at Florida, gets fired after a short tenure and then hops on to the Auburn staff as a DC for one year, not really improving their defense I might add, before bolting to SC. I do not want to hire Charlie Strong for a 1 year pit stop as a DC.I would be in favor of trying to get Charlie Strong as a DC. It's been said numerous times that he'd be an awesome DC.Folks--Banker won't be fired unless they can line up a quality DC to replace him first...and honestly, there aren't a lot of those on the market, and I don't think we can afford to risk promoting a position coach up.
Plus, would terminating Banker impact our recruitment? I haven't kept up on our recruiting...
You will see the light on this one to, you are just alittle slow on the evalI think Banker should go. I backed him heavily even after the OSU game, but after the Iowa game I realized something: We sh#t the bed against above average offenses, especially on the road. Ohio State's elite offense? Destroyed us. Iowa's slightly above-average offense? Destroyed us. Minnesota's decent offense? Had they not made a ton of mistakes, we would have lost. I had legit hope up to and including the Wisconsin game, because our defense performed as they should have in every one of those games, but that was all erased in the past 4 games.Banker lost a ton on the line and we will see how the defense does next year.
As for Langsdorf, I can see either side. If he got fired, I wouldn't riot. If he got retained, I wouldn't riot either. I'm leaning more towards fire him too only because I am still not comfortable with his play calling abilities, There is no wrong side on this matter (except stupid ones, of course). I'll be patient with him even though I don't want to be.
I like Cav. Had to work with walk-ons, and still produced a not-horrendous o-line.
As long as Keith Williams starts smiling in group photos and stops getting DUIs, I like him. Great recruiter and very enthusiastic. Seriously though, has anyone seen his Instagram? Almost looks like he's intentionally frowning in photos.