Everything you mention is true except last sentence - now with different behavior the last sentence could be possible. When I heard that the three sit out players hadcbeat the starters upibdidnt know that it was with 2 walk ons and it happened regularly by many points - so guessing cam macks attitude was taking into effect who would be the starting 5 next year....I know none of us can fully understand what is happening in a kid's life. But, to me this is a prime example of :bang with the constant transfers in college basketball.
Here is a kid that has a dream of going to the NBA. He's a really good player. He probably has the raw talent to get there some day. He obviously tried to go to the NBA this year and it's not goin to work out.
So...his only option is to transfer and probably sit out a year. He basically delayed fulfilling his NBA dream by at least a year. The only way he didn't is if he gets a waiver from the NCAA which, who knows what criteria they use for making up their minds.
He could have stayed in a program and develop with the players around him and played another year in a very competitive league to showcase his talents.
Why is the last sentence wrong? I think would still have been the starting point guard. Put that better talent around him and he has a much better chance to show really what he can do.Everything you mention is true except last sentence - now with different behavior the last sentence could be possible. When I heard that the three sit out players hadcbeat the starters upibdidnt know that it was with 2 walk ons and it happened regularly by many points - so guessing cam macks attitude was taking into effect who would be the starting 5 next year....
It will technically be his fifth school. Went to Stephen F Austin out of HS, transferred to a juco in Kansas (I forget which one) for about a minute, went to Salt Lake CC and then Nebraska.Why is the last sentence wrong? I think would still have been the starting point guard. Put that better talent around him and he has a much better chance to show really what he can do.
Does he think that list of teams interested in him have better talent? Are they going to play against better talent? If he’s not willing to compete for the starting job at his second school, dies he think the NBA is going to be more impressed at his third? How about a forth?
I think CM was let go - he made decisions that werent team first. The talent level this year will be much higher then last. Some kids work harder when a challenge is presented - some fold.Why is the last sentence wrong? I think would still have been the starting point guard. Put that better talent around him and he has a much better chance to show really what he can do.
Does he think that list of teams interested in him have better talent? Are they going to play against better talent? If he’s not willing to compete for the starting job at his second school, dies he think the NBA is going to be more impressed at his third? How about a forth?
I understand that. When I'm frustrated about transfers, I'm also talking about someone like this that COULD be a great contributor to the team, but leaves or is pushed out because of a bad attitude.I think CM was let go - he made decisions that werent team first. The talent level this year will be much higher then last. Some kids work harder when a challenge is presented - some fold.
No pro league will. If he doesn't fix his attitude, both on and off the court, he won't stick anywhere very long.The NBA isn't going to stand for that either.
This is one hell of a pickup for Prairie View A&M
To be honest, it won't matter. If his attitude and discipline don't improve he has no chance.Well I don’t that’s gonna help his NBA aspirations