Carl Crawford vs. Bubba Starling

Pick One

  • Carl Crawford

    Votes: 14 70.0%

  • Bubba Starling

    Votes: 6 30.0%
  • Total voters
    20
This is a fun one.  For me it's Crawford.  Dude was in the big leagues by the time he was 20.  Was a 2nd round draft pick in baseball, had a scholly offer to UCLA for basketball and every option based college in the country wanted him at QB for football.  One of my good friends who lived in Houston and played against Crawford swears he's the best athlete he's ever seen.

 
I don't think this one is even close.  Even if Starling had stayed at UNL, wasn't he still considered a project?  Crawford seemed like a better fit in Solich's offense and I don't trust Pelini's staff to develop a qb with so much raw talent.  I think our program would be in a much different place if Crawford had played football.  I think we would be in the exact same place if Starling had stayed.

 
Xmas32 said:
This is a fun one.  For me it's Crawford.  Dude was in the big leagues by the time he was 20.  Was a 2nd round draft pick in baseball, had a scholly offer to UCLA for basketball and every option based college in the country wanted him at QB for football.  One of my good friends who lived in Houston and played against Crawford swears he's the best athlete he's ever seen.
Click to expand...


On one hand, I think he could have beaten out Crouch. That might be blasphemy to say about a Heisman Trophy winner, but even if he didn't, he would have started over Lord for two years.

On the other hand, by that time, the offense was so incredibly dependent on the QB, I don't know if he alone could have changed the trajectory of the program alone. Lord put up fantastic numbers, and the team still stumbled in '02 and '03. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Crawford for sure.  But Donovan McNabb could also be a part of this poll.  Thought I read there was a time where he was considered a husk lean.

 
Cdog923 said:
On one hand, I think he could have beaten out Crouch. That might be blasphemy to say about a Heisman Trophy winner, but even if he didn't, he would have started over Lord for two years.

On the other hand, by that time, the offense was so incredibly dependent on the QB, I don't know if he alone could have changed the trajectory of the program alone. Lord put up fantastic numbers, and the team still stumbled in '02 and '03. 
Click to expand...


It's a fascinating hypothetical.  I remember Lord taking an absolute beating and wonder if Crawford could hold up, that being said, they're roughly the same size (6'2, 215ish)

 
Xmas32 said:
It's a fascinating hypothetical.  I remember Lord taking an absolute beating and wonder if Crawford could hold up, that being said, they're roughly the same size (6'2, 215ish)
Click to expand...


Would they have been the same type of runner? I remember Lord being a bruiser, a Tebow/Frost type of power runner. Would Crawford been more elusive? A Crouch/Martinez type? 

 
Xmas32 said:
It's a fascinating hypothetical.  I remember Lord taking an absolute beating and wonder if Crawford could hold up, that being said, they're roughly the same size (6'2, 215ish)
Click to expand...


I've often wondered if the absolute beating Lord took wasn't mostly self-inflicted?  He was running behind a 1st Team All American tackle and behind a solid center.  Back then, I thought the OL was unfairly blamed because it seemed Lord wasn't exactly on the same page as his OL.  I always wondered on the plays where he made something out of nothing came from him going the wrong way to begin with.

 
ADS said:
Is Donovan McNabb our HC today instead of Frost?
Click to expand...
j5ZHOx1.gif


 
Back
Top