Censorship

Archy1221 said:
I actually did ask you and you graciously gave your answer.  
 

unfortunate you feel that way.  We shall agree to disagree then. 
Click to expand...
I'm good with that, but just so we're clear, I'm not necessarily happy about inequality in any case.  Unfortunately it's a reality we have to live with in many facets of our lives.  But sometimes, all things considered, it's the best option.  That's why I feel Trump getting the boot was the right call.  Sure, one could go down the list and name a bunch of other A-holes who should be banned too and you'd be right.  

I guess, I'm more of a "big picture" kind of guy on things like this.  

 
Archy1221 said:
Is it your position that Twitter terms of service should be different based on job title when it comes to calls for violence 
Click to expand...
Twitter can do what it wants, I dont give a damn. Im saying its far more likely that someone will actually commit violence if DT tells them to as opposed to KG. 

 
Notre Dame Joe said:
All of the enemies of freedom are hypocrites and liars.  That's a given.  They don't have standards beyond their perceived immediate advantage.  But they don't respect other people.  The only way to get more fair treatment is to force them.  We just have to wait a while until the Rs are back in power.  The Ds really don't want their to be free speech, they invented the phrase "safe space."
Click to expand...
Please for the love of God learn what the first amendement protects you from. And then seek help. 

 
Frott Scost said:
Twitter can do what it wants, I dont give a damn. Im saying its far more likely that someone will actually commit violence if DT tells them to as opposed to KG. 
Click to expand...
It’s possible that is true.  Doesn’t change the fact that terms of service for inciting violence should be same across the board.  
 

Hopefully the Dems will do a much better job about regulating the social media companies than then Republicans did.  Possibly break them up into components like the old Bell’s. 

 
Archy1221 said:
It’s possible that is true.  Doesn’t change the fact that terms of service for inciting violence should be same across the board.  
 

Hopefully the Dems will do a much better job about regulating the social media companies than then Republicans did.  Possibly break them up into components like the old Bell’s. 
Click to expand...
Isnt that communism? Government control over private companies and breaking apart their companies.

 
Frott Scost said:
When did I say she was permitted? I said who would actually go commit violence because Kathy Griffin told them to?
Click to expand...
You people think maga supporters committed violence when Trump did nottell them to.

But several celebrities extolled violence against Trump and you say its okay because no one would ever do it.

I can't find your logic, there probably isn't any to find. 

 
Notre Dame Joe said:
You people think maga supporters committed violence when Trump did nottell them to.
Click to expand...
 they wound that crowd into a frenzy and then told them to go to the capitol.    if barack and the clintons had done the same exact thing with their followers you would have been calling for tanks in the streets and public executions.

 
commando said:
 they wound that crowd into a frenzy and then told them to go to the capitol.    if barack and the clintons had done the same exact thing with their followers you would have been calling for tanks in the streets and public executions.
Click to expand...
Ds have already said much worse.  I betcha can't find a post where I called for anything other than the drunk tank.

 
Back
Top