Dana Holgorsen Hired as Offensive Coordinator

Saw a post from someone who said that over their respective OC/HC careers, Holgorsen has averaged 10 PPG more than Satterfield.

If you could add 10 PPG to our scores from last year, we would've been 10-2, and this year we'd be at 8-1. Because math.
An interesting deep-dive stat - how many times were we up one score and held the opposing team from scoring?  I say that remembering the lone lead at OSU, their offense was terrible, and the moment they got down they walked through our D like we were on a bye week.

I think we probably beat Illinois with 10 more points as their momentum got going very late.  For OSU it seemed like every time they opened up the playbook they had their way.  That was a strange game.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
An interesting deep-dive stat - how many times were we up one score and held the opposing team from scoring?  I say that remembering the lone lead at OSU, their offense was terrible, and the moment they got down they walked through our D like we were on a bye week.

I think we probably beat Illinois with 10 more points as their momentum got going very late.  For OSU it seemed like every time they opened up the playbook they had their way.  That was a strange game.
I really believe if the offense does ANYTHING the D is going to get better.  I'm not talking about Sedona Vortex energy, but just the confidence that would be instilled in the entire team knowing we have a chance instead of "3 and out".  We are also losing field position like no one's business.  Just getting a couple first downs can change the game.

 
I really believe if the offense does ANYTHING the D is going to get better.  I'm not talking about Sedona Vortex energy, but just the confidence that would be instilled in the entire team knowing we have a chance instead of "3 and out".  We are also losing field position like no one's business.  Just getting a couple first downs can change the game.
Agreed; Colorado was probably our best example of both sides feeling off one another, at least the first half.

Also interesting (there's a lot I'm interested in) - Rhule said he expected the Colorado game to go that way.  I'm curious where the personnel and planning deficiencies have crept in to not have the same confidence against B!G teams.

 
Finally an actual coach on the offensive side of the ball. It’s not a coaches issue or just a players issue this year that ails us, players need to make plays but coaches also need to not sugar coat s#!t and call out what needs to be fixed.

love the accountability we’ve seen in 10 days from Dana that we haven’t seen in close to 2 years by this offensive staff 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
An interesting deep-dive stat - how many times were we up one score and held the opposing team from scoring?  I say that remembering the lone lead at OSU, their offense was terrible, and the moment they got down they walked through our D like we were on a bye week.

I think we probably beat Illinois with 10 more points as their momentum got going very late.  For OSU it seemed like every time they opened up the playbook they had their way.  That was a strange game.


It was a bad time to break, but it's not like they weren't trying before and just tried for that drive.  They had to convert a fourth down, on that drive, I wouldn't call it "walking through" our defense. That's a really good offense, and in the second half we had held them to three 3 and outs and an INT which probably just wasn't sustainable. 

To your question, do you want to count early game stops when we just went up a score? 

UTEP - made them go 3 and out after each of our first 2 TDs. We did give up a TD in between those, but then also got a safety on their next drive.

Colorado - 4 and out (is that  a thing?) on their drive after our first TD after a long kick return put our backs really against the wall, then a pick-six on their next drive after that. Then another 3 and out.

UNI - Allowed a 16 play field goal drive after going up 7-0, forced a punt after going up 14-3

Illinois - Allowed a field goal after we took a 10-7 lead. Forced a 3 and out out of halftime leading 17-10. Gave up a TD drive after going up 24-17.

Purdue - Forced a 3 and out after going up 7-3.

Rutgers - Forced a punt after going up 7-0. Actually stopped them on 4th and 3, but a very late false start call moved them back and they punted instead.

Indiana - Never had a lead to protect

Ohio State - As you pointed out, allowed a TD drive to relinquish the lead right after taking it.

UCLA - No leads to protect.

Other noteworthy moments that don't fit the criteria, but I think fit the vibe:

UTEP - After having a really bad 3 plays to allow them to tie it at 7, UTEP went 3 and out, safety, 3 and out, INT.

Illinois - We threw an INT after letting Illinois tie it at 10, and the defense made a 4th down stop. After Illinois tied it at 24, the offense had a -13 yard  3 and out so you'd worry the momentum was gone. Instead, the defense forced Illinois into a 3 and out as well. Then after the offense bungled what should have been a go ahead drive, the defense stopped Illinois again to force OT.

Ohio State - After giving up the lead, the defense did get the ball back for the offense with 3:36 to play. Even with the big plays allowed, this has been OSUs worst offensive game by a decent margin. Penn State gave up fewer yards per play and only 20 points, but gave up a lot more 3 downs and total yardage/control of the game.

UCLA - After letting up the long TD to go down 27-7, UCLA only ran 13 plays (minus the kneeldown) for 44 yards, allowing the offense to claw back in.

Sorry for the essay, but I just don't think the defense consistently fails at the worst time. At that may not have been exactly your point. But the only times I see where the defense gave the lead back right away were OSU and Illinois (let it get back to 10-10), and in both those cases they also got a stop right after to give the offense another chance. The defense is failing some fans eye tests not because it's been bad, but because the team isn't winning the games. And that's 95% on the offense, IMO.

 
Finally an actual coach on the offensive side of the ball. It’s not a coaches issue or just a players issue this year that ails us, players need to make plays but coaches also need to not sugar coat s#!t and call out what needs to be fixed.

love the accountability we’ve seen in 10 days from Dana that we haven’t seen in close to 2 years by this offensive staff 
Any staff since Bo tbh.

 
I just want to see the offense play with (a mix of) more energy and urgency.  Like attacking with some up-tempo stuff at times.  And playing fired up on offense.  Would love to see them enjoy making plays.  And making plays is on the players, and it's been missing.  With the exception of Barney and a couple nice plays by several players each game (Fidone, Neyor, RJ, EJ, DD, Lloyd, DRaiola). 

Just be more consistent, play with more energy, make plays and score more points.  Keep attacking when playing out in front and ahead.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I guess I've never heard him speak before.  It's kind of surprising how normal he is.  He always seemed like a bit of a weirdo at a distance. 

:lol:

 
16 hours ago, admo said:

Holgo has the confidence and realistic approach that Leach had.  He's a smart guy and tells it like it is, for sure.  It's great having a new set of eyes, a different opinion and a strong voice... and I also credit Rhule for bringing him onboard.



Hopefully he's here for longer than just this season...I think we need Dana for a player like DR to mature. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top