Wait, how are these different? How do you define 'good' besides 'playing well'? Am I missing something?he has skills. "Not good" is not an apt description. "Not playing well," that's a great description.
The schemes are vastly different. You can't compare a dude's coverage from last year to this year because they simply aren't playing the same defense.He has played well in the past. That he isn't now is a bigger mystery than that he did before.
Did people forget 2014? Davie wasn't some chump out there getting burned game in and game out. That's the same dude out there. The results are different, but it's the same guy.
But that doesn't mean he doesn't have talent. He does. It may not match this scheme (I think it does, but we'll see), but that's a very different thing than not having talent.The schemes are vastly different. You can't compare a dude's coverage from last year to this year because they simply aren't playing the same defense.He has played well in the past. That he isn't now is a bigger mystery than that he did before.
Did people forget 2014? Davie wasn't some chump out there getting burned game in and game out. That's the same dude out there. The results are different, but it's the same guy.
Davie might be a good player in some schemes - but he certainly looks awful in this scheme.
Maybe obvious, but I wonder if he's uncomfortable being out there on an island and is overthinking?Maybe last year he played up to his full potential.He had a lot of help back there last season. This year he looks like he lost confidence - and a step.![]()
This. He's been in position. He could have made plays on the ball if he'd have looked. He's been skilled up to a point - the point where the ball contacts the receiver's hands. Then he seems to be unskilled.Davie can cover, he just does not finish plays. He needs to look for the ball and make his hands active.