he was the one who poisened it? he drank some, dropped some poisen in it...then left?? NOhe was the one who poisened it? he drank some, dropped some poisen in it...then left??
1. Was the posioning from the punch? YES1. Was the posioning from the punch?2. If the posioning was from the punch, did the man not drink enough?
3. Sorta related to KansasHusker's question - if the punch was the source of the posioning, was it "spiked" after the man left or after the man drank it?
1. Was the ingediant in the punch that posioned the guests something that took time to "react" after being added to the punch? In other words, it didn't become "active" until some time after the man drank the punch? YES1. Was the ingediant in the punch that posioned the guests something that took time to "react" after being added to the punch? In other words, it didn't become "active" until some time after the man drank the punch?
2. Was anything added to the punch after the man drank it?
3. If anything was added to the punch after the man drank it - even if it wasn't posion - was that what posioned the guests?
Was one glass too little to cause death and toxic levels were only reached after several glasses? NOWas one glass too little to cause death and toxic levels were only reached after several glasses?
Was the punch spiked AFTER the man drank a glass/cup? NOWas the punch spiked AFTER the man drank a glass/cup?
Is the drug that was used in the punch significant?
Was the man somehow immune to the poison? NOWas the man somehow immune to the poison?
Did something else have to occur (besides drinking it) in order for the ingredient in the punch to be toxic?