It's incredibly useful for that exact purpose, like beyond useful for that exact purpose. Lol.
You're projecting again. It's coming off as extremely patronizing. Believing the Bible was written in different styles and not all of it is to be taken literally isn't the giant leap in a person's mindset you're making it out to be. The way you felt about it when you questioned it and then stopped believing in it doesn't apply to everyone.I understand why you're confused, Landlord. I was there.
If you're not aware, that is really condescending. You assume others are "confused" or "struggling" with their faith because of your personal beliefs and biases, while basically ignoring what it is others are telling you. I don't think LOMS is confused and I'm sure not. The only confusion I have surrounding this issue is some of the logic leaps you are making.I understand why you're confused, Landlord. I was there.
I think the point is; if the bible itself says it is to be taken literally, but it's stories don't jive with the real world it's foundation as an infallible religious text is built on sand. If one subject xan be questioned, then all of them are in question.It's incredibly useful for that exact purpose, like beyond useful for that exact purpose. Lol.If you're telling me the Bible is useful as the foundation of a religion, that doesn't make sense.
Exactly. It's obnoxious. I've enjoyed this conversation immensely and am completely at peace with the idea that I don't know everything.If you're not aware, that is really condescending. You assume others are "confused" or "struggling" with their faith because of your personal beliefs and biases, while basically ignoring what it is others are telling you. I don't think LOMS is confused and I'm sure not. The only confusion I have surrounding this issue is some of the logic leaps you are making.I understand why you're confused, Landlord. I was there.
Religious texts are always in question, by their nature. It's difficult to impossible to back up the text with scientific evidence. It's up to people to decide for themselves. If I wanted to I could decide to only believe in the Gospel and start my own branch of Christianity based on that. The Catholics and Mormons have their own books that I've never read, so are those 2 groups going to hell or am I? Or is it okay to get some stuff wrong? I think it's the latter.I think the point is; if the bible itself says it is to be taken literally, but it's stories don't jive with the real world it's foundation as an infallible religious text is built on sand. If one subject xan be questioned, then all of them are in question.It's incredibly useful for that exact purpose, like beyond useful for that exact purpose. Lol.If you're telling me the Bible is useful as the foundation of a religion, that doesn't make sense.
People are stupid and horrible. It's not religion's fault.That hasn't stopped millions of people from dying or killing based off its many interpretations.
I think the bible says it's not ok to get it wrong though, right? I know it's hypothetical; but if you start a new religion based on the New Testament only, that's not going to jive with all its references to the Old Testament. And now man has created the religion and not god. The religion has become the crutch for the belief system of the individual(s).Religious texts are always in question, by their nature. It's difficult to impossible to back up the text with scientific evidence. It's up to people to decide for themselves. If I wanted to I could decide to only believe in the Gospel and start my own branch of Christianity based on that. The Catholics and Mormons have their own books that I've never read, so are those 2 groups going to hell or am I? Or is it okay to get some stuff wrong? I think it's the latter.I think the point is; if the bible itself says it is to be taken literally, but it's stories don't jive with the real world it's foundation as an infallible religious text is built on sand. If one subject xan be questioned, then all of them are in question.It's incredibly useful for that exact purpose, like beyond useful for that exact purpose. Lol.If you're telling me the Bible is useful as the foundation of a religion, that doesn't make sense.
ZRod said:Idk... god told Abraham amd David to do some f'd up sh#t. He also f'd Job over.People are stupid and horrible. It's not religion's fault.That hasn't stopped millions of people from dying or killing based off its many interpretations.
Idk... god told Abraham and David to do some f'd up sh#t. He also f'd Job and the Egyptians overPeople are stupid and horrible. It's not religion's fault.That hasn't stopped millions of people from dying or killing based off its many interpretations.
Partly true. Partly not true at all.People are stupid and horrible. It's not religion's fault.That hasn't stopped millions of people from dying or killing based off its many interpretations.
Religion is the root cause. It plants the idea's into people's heads.People are stupid and horrible. It's not religion's fault.That hasn't stopped millions of people from dying or killing based off its many interpretations.