schriznoeder
New member
[No message]
So sticking with the theme that Mueller believes certain actions are outside of his purview and must be left to others...
This decision would seem to indicate he believes another group, perhaps an independent branch of government that is constitutionally-endowed with the power and duty to provide checks and balances on the other branches, should then interview Trump, correct?
The answers they gave were inadequate. He didn't believe it was his job (or worth the fight) to force Trump to interview under oath.
I've been called nuts recently for believing this, but it still seems to me we're slowly cruising towards an eventual testimony, under oath, by the president in front of Congress. Is that nuts?
If that isn't collusion - the bar is too high. Sure isn't by happen chance.Wow, this is crazy!
It is nuts, because you’re forgetting how many Republicans are in Congress and how Congress has shown there are no repercussions when Trump says no. The Republicans refuse to override any of his vetoes, so there’s now way they’re going to get him to come and testify. If he says no they’ll do nothing to him. They’ve proven they won’t do anything to him, so he has no reason to say yes.
Scandalous!As a bone to our Trump supporters who continue to post in these threads, let's remember back to one (just one!) of Obama's many scandals.