HANC
New member
Let me start by saying that I support Bo and think he will bring Nu back into the top 25 and higher........but just for debate purposes and to get the board going.........
Do you think that Bo is getting a little "benefit of the doubt" just because he has coached here in the past. I have a hard time believing that everyone who is "defending" some of the issues this season wouldn't be blasting BC under the same circumstances...
examples:
MU and OU blowouts: BC would have been thrown under the bus...guaranteed...Bo is still building is what
the consensus seems to be. (yes, our guys haven't given up, I will say that), but
obviously, the game-plans have been simarly anemic
Bo's actions on sidelines: BC got thrown under bus for throat-slach and hillbilly remark, but Bo actually
gets a 15 yd vs VT that cost us big (something BC didnt do). Bo is always
yelling and screaming at officials, which to the dismay of some, doesn't always
sit well with "mamas" of recruits. Viewed as hot-head and poor sportsmanship.
But, many of us (including me) just write it off as "passion".
Traditions: If BC would have taken away the blackshirts for the entire year, the State would explode.
If you think anything different, then you are dead wrong.....we would say, another tradition
that BC is taking away or ruining....but with Bo, we applaud him for being strict and appreciating
the tradition.
Not letting players talk to media: BC was and would have been blasted. Bo is just protecting and moving
forward.
Once again, I wouldn't trade Bo for many coaches, especially BC. I am 100 % in support of the change, but as a coach myself, it seems a little funny to sit and read all of the remarks concerning the above issues, especially after reading just the opposite last year at this time.
Do you think that Bo is getting a little "benefit of the doubt" just because he has coached here in the past. I have a hard time believing that everyone who is "defending" some of the issues this season wouldn't be blasting BC under the same circumstances...
examples:
MU and OU blowouts: BC would have been thrown under the bus...guaranteed...Bo is still building is what
the consensus seems to be. (yes, our guys haven't given up, I will say that), but
obviously, the game-plans have been simarly anemic
Bo's actions on sidelines: BC got thrown under bus for throat-slach and hillbilly remark, but Bo actually
gets a 15 yd vs VT that cost us big (something BC didnt do). Bo is always
yelling and screaming at officials, which to the dismay of some, doesn't always
sit well with "mamas" of recruits. Viewed as hot-head and poor sportsmanship.
But, many of us (including me) just write it off as "passion".
Traditions: If BC would have taken away the blackshirts for the entire year, the State would explode.
If you think anything different, then you are dead wrong.....we would say, another tradition
that BC is taking away or ruining....but with Bo, we applaud him for being strict and appreciating
the tradition.
Not letting players talk to media: BC was and would have been blasted. Bo is just protecting and moving
forward.
Once again, I wouldn't trade Bo for many coaches, especially BC. I am 100 % in support of the change, but as a coach myself, it seems a little funny to sit and read all of the remarks concerning the above issues, especially after reading just the opposite last year at this time.