Douschebag Hall of Fame

[zoogs]

cm isn't that bad. I disagree with him sometimes, agree with him sometimes, and he always offers an argument to back up his assertions. Reasonable people can disagree.

A few other posters I won't name, on the other hand, are pretttttttttttty far gone from the realm of 'reasonable people might disagree' ... in a way that's kinda funny, yes, but isn't really a very good joke in the end.

 

[Mierin]

cm isn't that bad. I disagree with him sometimes, agree with him sometimes, and he always offers an argument to back up his assertions. Reasonable people can disagree.

A few other posters I won't name, on the other hand, are pretttttttttttty far gone from the realm of 'reasonable people might disagree' ... in a way that's kinda funny, yes, but isn't really a very good joke in the end.

Wait until he calls you racist for saying Wal-mart outsources to save money.

 

[RedDenver]

What do starving kids in Africa and Pokemon Go have in common?

They both have worms

BOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[C N Red]

It's impossible to have an intelligent conversation with teachercd. If you make anything resembling a good point he drops the convo and goes fullblown into sarcastomode and makes sh#t up.

That's b/c he is drunk 90% of the time. And to just think, he's teaching some peoples children. But in saying that, I really don't have a problem with him and have always thought he was a fairly good poster.

 

[ZRod]

What do starving kids in Africa and Pokemon Go have in common?

They both have worms

BOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Boo dis man!!a

 

[RedSavage]

What do starving kids in Africa and Pokemon Go have in common?

They both have worms

BOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Boo dis man!!a

 

[Mierin]

Bla.

 

[desertshox]

cm isn't that bad. I disagree with him sometimes, agree with him sometimes, and he always offers an argument to back up his assertions. Reasonable people can disagree.

A few other posters I won't name, on the other hand, are pretttttttttttty far gone from the realm of 'reasonable people might disagree' ... in a way that's kinda funny, yes, but isn't really a very good joke in the end.

that word i bolded doesnt describe cm at all.

 

[Enhance]

cm isn't that bad. I disagree with him sometimes, agree with him sometimes, and he always offers an argument to back up his assertions. Reasonable people can disagree.

A few other posters I won't name, on the other hand, are pretttttttttttty far gone from the realm of 'reasonable people might disagree' ... in a way that's kinda funny, yes, but isn't really a very good joke in the end.

Well I think that about proves there's an admin/mod conspiracy to torture the board.

 

[Mierin]

I find it ridiculous that people here can be complete a$$hole$ as long as they skirt around one arbitrary rule and they're continued to be allowed to be a$$hole$ for an infinite amount of time with no repercussions.

I also find it ridiculous that 2 warnings in 5 years is considered a lot.

 

[cm husker]

From cm husker:

Just because someone is brown doesn't mean their workmanship is automatically worse

Seriously, f#*k this guy. He writes the most f'ing stupid things I've ever read in my life.

Sorry I touched a nerve. You're the one who was arguing we only outsource to save money.

Believe it or not, foreign people make great products. Products that are just as good or better than US workers.

The fact that they are significantly cheaper is icing.

American companies did not outsource to China in the 80s because their products were better. You're a f'ing idiot if you think that's why. You're also a f'ing idiot for saying I'm racist because I say American companies outsourced to China to save money.

Obviously there are products we import from other countries because they're better. But you either knew those were by and large not the products I was referring to (I was talking outsourcing, not importing) and decided to be an a-hole, or you are a moron. That leaves you with being an a-hole, a moron, a troll, or a combination of the three.

Every forum you post in becomes worse for having your posts.

where did I say you were a racist?

Look at the first bolded. If you can't get the difference between "products were better" versus "products were of equal quality and cheaper" then I can't help you.

The way you're losing your sh#t, I'll leave you be and not point out that you seem to not understand how "importing" and "outsourcing" are functionally the same thing regarding the second bolded statement. though it would be amusing to watch you try to define the difference.

This is the problem with liberals. They are so convinced that they are good hearted that they won't admit it when their stated domestic laborist policies hurt foreigners and may actually be racist in effect (for example, even if Bernie isn't a racist, his policies have the same effect as many right wing racist policies).

 

[cm husker]

cm isn't that bad. I disagree with him sometimes, agree with him sometimes, and he always offers an argument to back up his assertions. Reasonable people can disagree.

A few other posters I won't name, on the other hand, are pretttttttttttty far gone from the realm of 'reasonable people might disagree' ... in a way that's kinda funny, yes, but isn't really a very good joke in the end.

Wait until he calls you racist for saying Wal-mart outsources to save money.

You really are clueless about how Walmart functions. And that's ok.

but I'd love to see the link to where I called you a racist. This should be good.

Just because I said you need to understand that brown people make products as good as the US doesn't mean I think you're a racist. I just think you don't understand economics and business decision making.

 

[Mierin]

cm isn't that bad. I disagree with him sometimes, agree with him sometimes, and he always offers an argument to back up his assertions. Reasonable people can disagree.

A few other posters I won't name, on the other hand, are pretttttttttttty far gone from the realm of 'reasonable people might disagree' ... in a way that's kinda funny, yes, but isn't really a very good joke in the end.

Well I think that about proves there's an admin/mod conspiracy to torture the board.

To be fair, zoogs didn't quantify that comment. Did he mean "cm isn't that bad... compared to people who use their cell phones in the middle of movie theaters?" or did he mean "cm isn't that bad... compared to Donald Trump."

I would disagree with the former and probably agree with the latter.

 

[JJ Husker]

I find it ridiculous that people here can be complete a$$hole$ as long as they skirt around one arbitrary rule and they're continued to be allowed to be a$$hole$ for an infinite amount of time with no repercussions.

I also find it ridiculous that 2 warnings in 5 years is considered a lot.

This seems rather vague. We need deets so we can laugh and point. Without details, I will assume you are directly referring to Red Dead with the first part of this.

 

[The Dude]

cm just seems like a pathological liar. "I have buddies that coach D1 football" isn't an argument.

Wipe the sand out.

Here are some stories on the same issue since you won't believe anything else.

http://www.syracuse.com/orangefootball/index.ssf/2014/06/college_football_recruiting_stars_rankings.html

He also spoke about another factor that ESPN.com doesn't value highly in its rankings: scholarship offers. Since the NCAA moved the deadline for committable offers to be made from Sept. 1 of an athlete's junior year to Aug. 1 preceding their senior year, the amount of offers has skyrocketed.

Coupled with passionate fan bases and college coaches who may offer a player simply because another in-conference school offered, many players rack up 30-plus invites -- some of which are committable, some of which aren't.

"The whole offer thing always irks me," Luginbill said. "But when I bring it up to people and explain it, I usually get, 'that makes a lot of sense.'"

....

Huffman said Scout.com doesn't put much weight into offers, but tries to understand which offers are committable.

"You have to dwindle the offers to real offers," Huffman said. "You have thirty schools that offer a kid but only five schools would take him. But the (other) schools still want those checkmarks there."

People who buy into offer lists are saps, to borrow a line from Walter.

This stuff is common knowledge; sorry I used some first hand information to express it.

Here's an extreme example, but it also demonstrates how recruits drive the hype during recruiting processes, and you can be assured that many assume a "letter of interest" is an "offer" (and in some ways, you can't blame them, which is why we should do away with signing day) - http://espn.go.com/espn/columns/story?id=3236039

Here's an example of how recruiting advisors emphasize that players shouldn't exaggerate or misrepresent offer lists (which many do, hence the advice):

10. EXAGGERATE Just dont do it! Do not stretch the truth when it comes to your size, weight, speed, stats or even the number of offers you have. College coaches do their due diligence during the evaluation process. If you stretch the truth about any of your size, weight or speed they will find out when they measure and test you. In some cases, it may only take a simple eye test to know you are not telling them the truth. They will verify you stats with your coaches. And when it comes to offers, the college coaching fraternity is much smaller than you think. Coaches talk all the time. They will know if you are being truthful about your offers. You may think that just stretching the truth will help you get ahead, but telling those little white lies can only hurt your standing with coaches. It will make a coach question your character, honesty and reliability.

Yeah I just don't care enough about that topic to read any of that.