HuskerHacker
Banned
Darn, I applied the other day on the Mizzou boards in hopes of responding in the Bradley thread.. Still not approved, still can't post but was going to post this:
Edit:
PS: not sure if spoilers are approved on HB, if not message me and I'll remove it.
First let me just lol,
Secondly let me say that players with NFL aspirations are more concerned with (1.) winning tradition, (2.) national exposure and (3.) programs with successful developmental history.
So, addressing each, one by one, for the "show me" state boys (and girls)
1. Winning tradition:
Link: NU vs MU rivalry
All time record between Huskers and Tigers
First Meeting November 5, 1892
Nebraska: 65-36-3 (Enough Said, btw it's often referred to as "Score Board")
2. One can argue that Mizzou has a lead in this catagory now that they are SEC but if Mizzou continues losing to the Vandals and not having any chance of reaching the SEC CG then any level minded person would give this to the Huskers. The BIG network is second to none, the media coverage is also second to none (meaning the network covers the most densely populated area in the states) and Nebraska will continue to compete regularly in the Conference CG. (Hence even more exposure.)
3. Yes MU has improved as of late but will anyone here actually argue that MU has the same NFL tradition as the skers? I couldn't help but lol when I read the Ben Bradley comments. MU fans trying to belittle the skers and talking trash in one breath about who has the most current in the NFL and then mentioning a congrats on the O and D linemen we have. Last I checked, both Bradley and Johnson are D linemen so I should instead say thanks for pointing out the truth. NU is better then MU when referring to both O and D linemen.
So... in my closing let me just add this, Mr. Bradley, Mr Johnson, you two heard it here first. Missou fans admit Nebraska does in fact provide the two of you a better path to the NFL.
Enjoy the laughs and whining traditions here on MU boards and when you decide to become part of a real football tradition, come on over and join us in Husker Nation.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all!!
Secondly let me say that players with NFL aspirations are more concerned with (1.) winning tradition, (2.) national exposure and (3.) programs with successful developmental history.
So, addressing each, one by one, for the "show me" state boys (and girls)
1. Winning tradition:
Link: NU vs MU rivalry
All time record between Huskers and Tigers
First Meeting November 5, 1892
Nebraska: 65-36-3 (Enough Said, btw it's often referred to as "Score Board")
2. One can argue that Mizzou has a lead in this catagory now that they are SEC but if Mizzou continues losing to the Vandals and not having any chance of reaching the SEC CG then any level minded person would give this to the Huskers. The BIG network is second to none, the media coverage is also second to none (meaning the network covers the most densely populated area in the states) and Nebraska will continue to compete regularly in the Conference CG. (Hence even more exposure.)
3. Yes MU has improved as of late but will anyone here actually argue that MU has the same NFL tradition as the skers? I couldn't help but lol when I read the Ben Bradley comments. MU fans trying to belittle the skers and talking trash in one breath about who has the most current in the NFL and then mentioning a congrats on the O and D linemen we have. Last I checked, both Bradley and Johnson are D linemen so I should instead say thanks for pointing out the truth. NU is better then MU when referring to both O and D linemen.
So... in my closing let me just add this, Mr. Bradley, Mr Johnson, you two heard it here first. Missou fans admit Nebraska does in fact provide the two of you a better path to the NFL.
Enjoy the laughs and whining traditions here on MU boards and when you decide to become part of a real football tradition, come on over and join us in Husker Nation.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all!!
Edit:
PS: not sure if spoilers are approved on HB, if not message me and I'll remove it.
Last edited by a moderator:
