BigRedBuster
Active member
Who has said we would be thrilled with a 6-6 season?GBR that is what I am worried about...say he finishes 4-8 this year...next year he goes 6-6...are we all of a sudden supposed be thrilled?
Who has said we would be thrilled with a 6-6 season?GBR that is what I am worried about...say he finishes 4-8 this year...next year he goes 6-6...are we all of a sudden supposed be thrilled?
1. Pro-style offenses really aren't that uncommon in college football. Shawn Watson's offense was based on the WCO. Tim Beck's offense didn't look all that much different from Watson's to me, but since he called it "multiple" I guess that's what everybody went with.Both brought in an NFL type offense. Both brought in their medicore buddies as DC. Both started a square-peg QB in a round hole. Both were hired by Harvey's henchmen. Both broke longtime NCAA leading streaks in their first season. Both had trouble dealing with the huge rosters in spring ball.The only thing similar between Riley and Clownahan is the situations they inherited when they came here. Both came into a situation where there was a lot of questioning with regards if the previous coach should have been removed. Both came into a program that had won nine games the year before. Other than that, there really is no comparison.
Should I keep going?
Beck's wasn't even close to WCO! And Watson didn't "bring in" the WCO. they just maintained it as status quo so Bo could focus on D.
2. So did Pelini after Carl went to FAU.
Papuchis was here 4 years before he was named DC
3. So did Watson and Beck with Martinez and Armstrong.
Huh? The offenses were practically made for those guys.
4. Harvey hired Osborne too, so I'm not sure where you're going with the "henchmen" thing.
That wasn't Harvey's choice. That was under duress from Boosters of Substance. And please don't compare TO to Eicherson or Pederhorst.
5. The streak that Callahan broke was a lot more important. I don't think very many people even knew that there was a "home opener winning streak" until we lost to BYU. This would be a more meaningful comparison if we finish with a losing record this year (which, to be fair, is very likely to happen).
Can't argue there. But if Riley goes 4-8, it will be worse. Although 5-7 would be more Callahanesque.
6. To be honest, I'm not sure what you're referring to here.
Callahan came in and cut the walkons by about 30 almost immediately. Riley split the team into two groups that practiced separately because he had no idea how to deal with more than 70-80 players in the spring.
Really the only other major similarity that couldn't be claimed for Pelini or pretty much any other coach we could've brought in instead of Riley is that, if we finish with a losing record, he and Callahan both did that their first year. Everything else just seems like a reach to me.
There are also the things listed in the post I responded to. Those wouldn't apply to Pelini. So yeah, pretty much none of it applies to Pelini.
If we started out 4 or 5-0 would we be having this convo. Are you an idiot.......Huskerfan92, I am not ready to fire Riley yet. He runs a completely different system then Bo. I still believe that he can do good things with his own players in here. It's hard to run a pro style offense with a QB that is an "athlete". We have to give the guy time. I don't want to cut him loose yet. In a few years, if things aren't improving and he isn't making the necessary changes, then yes! If you look at the first half of the season we were on lucks bad side. If we started out 4 or 5-0 would we even be having this convo. Most likely not.
My thought too.But in "Good Will Hunting," wasn't the janitor really good at complex math equations? Or maybe I'm just missing your point.I love when the idiots come out of the woodwork calling for the AD like they have a clue about running an athletic program at a power 5 school.
It's like watching good will hunting. A janitor that knows complex math equations.
on a messageboard
under an anonymous profile
epic![]()
I think Eichorst needs to go before Riley, that's for sure. He can't be allowed to hire another coach. Frankly, I don't think he can be left in a position where he's asked to fairly evaluate his own coach. That's why he needs to go.
I don't agree with those who say a new AD is a guarantee that a coach will be fired. Countless examples run counter to that claim, and if we get the right guy (i.e., not an ego manic or a lap dog to Perlman, who personally disliked Bo), then we can move forward in an intelligent way.
I remember when TO gave Callahan a set of very achievable benchmarks to save his job. He failed and he was fired, but I sincerely believe that if he'd fulfilled the requirements, TO would have retained him.
I don't believe that about guys like Perlman, Eichorst and Pederson; they are snakes in the grass who make a determination and then hope that results break in their favor so they are justified in retrospect. But regardless of results, they are going to carry out their agenda.
Leadership matters, and NU football is struggling as a direct result of awful administrative leadership.