ESPN releases initial FPI ratings for 2016 season

they have us at 25th after the poor season last year? maybe they think Nebraska has turned a corner and is on an upswing?

 
commando said:
they have us at 25th after the poor season last year? maybe they think Nebraska has turned a corner and is on an upswing?
Click to expand...
These are purely analytical, so not really based on anyone's opinions (other than the weight given to metrics). They're not nearly as good as SBNation's S&P+ rankings IMO, but hey, it's the offseason.

 
saunders45 said:
commando said:
they have us at 25th after the poor season last year? maybe they think Nebraska has turned a corner and is on an upswing?
Click to expand...
These are purely analytical, so not really based on anyone's opinions (other than the weight given to metrics). They're not nearly as good as SBNation's S&P+ rankings IMO, but hey, it's the offseason.
Click to expand...

Do you have a link to those? Not familiar with them. Why do you prefer them?

 
commando said:
they have us at 25th after the poor season last year? maybe they think Nebraska has turned a corner and is on an upswing?
Click to expand...
Turned a corner? I think you mean pulled out of a ditch that was last season.

NU was probably around the same last preseason (and underperformed based on the metrics) and has been in that range probably most of the past 15 years. Many fans think we should fire coaches who have us in the 9/10 win, ~50% division titles, and 15-30 ranking range.

To me, that's the interesting debate. If RIley matches but doesn't outperform the last staff in terms of on the field performance, should we fire them in 7 years? I don't think so. But that's probably for another thread.

Anyway, it could be moot as Riley will likely be retiring in about 7 years regardless.

 
cm husker said:
saunders45 said:
commando said:
they have us at 25th after the poor season last year? maybe they think Nebraska has turned a corner and is on an upswing?
Click to expand...
These are purely analytical, so not really based on anyone's opinions (other than the weight given to metrics). They're not nearly as good as SBNation's S&P+ rankings IMO, but hey, it's the offseason.
Click to expand...

Do you have a link to those? Not familiar with them. Why do you prefer them?
Click to expand...
I prefer them because they're more accurate, and less "hand wavey" than ESPN's FPI.

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaa

Also, Bill Connelly (who created them) is simply a huge CFB dork, and I admire his work. I'm halfway through his first book, and helped kickstart his second.

They do all kinds of analytical studies on CFB at his main SBNation site: http://www.footballstudyhall.com/.

Also, his podcast is pretty good, they've been discussing a "moneyball" approach to CFB lately in regards to non Power 5 teams which has been quite interesting.

 
saunders45 said:
commando said:
they have us at 25th after the poor season last year? maybe they think Nebraska has turned a corner and is on an upswing?
Click to expand...
These are purely analytical, so not really based on anyone's opinions (other than the weight given to metrics). They're not nearly as good as SBNation's S&P+ rankings IMO, but hey, it's the offseason.
Click to expand...
i don't understand if it is based solely on results from last year. but hey....we are top 25 in 1 preseason poll anyway. maybe we can be in the top 25 at the end of the year this year.
default_smile.png


 
commando said:
saunders45 said:
commando said:
they have us at 25th after the poor season last year? maybe they think Nebraska has turned a corner and is on an upswing?
Click to expand...
These are purely analytical, so not really based on anyone's opinions (other than the weight given to metrics). They're not nearly as good as SBNation's S&P+ rankings IMO, but hey, it's the offseason.
Click to expand...
i don't understand if it is based solely on results from last year. but hey....we are top 25 in 1 preseason poll anyway. maybe we can be in the top 25 at the end of the year this year.
default_smile.png
Click to expand...
It's not really based on results. It takes into account recruiting rankings, plus offensive and devensive efficiency numbers, turnover luck, returning starters, etc...

Basically, ESPN is starting to get into the game that Phil Steel started 2 decades ago, and others (SBNation) have been doing for quite a while.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Expanding on my point above, one thing the advanced stat guys in CFB all seem to agree on, is that Wins and Losses are not the best predictor.

Case in point, Nebraska. We lost 7 games, 5 that came down to a single play.

Here's a better breakdown of S&P+ (and why I like it).

The S&P statistic, developed by Bill Connelly, is made by compiling two different numbers: A team's success rate and Equivalent Points Per Play (PPP). Let's break each of these down individually. How much is eight yards worth to an offense? Obviously, the answer changes depending on the situation. If it's first-and-10, eight yards is valuable. If it's third-and-26, eight yards doesn't do so much. This is the reason that looking at a team's total yardage oftentimes is misleading, as it doesn't tell us if teams picked up valuable yards or simply junk yards. This is where Connelly's success rate comes in. He considers each play a "success" for the offense if it meets the following criteria: 50 percent of needed yards on first down, 70 percent of needed yards on second down, or 100 percent of needed yards on third or fourth down.

So on first-and-10, a "success" is if the offense gains five yards or more. On second-and-20, a "success" would be 14 yards or more. On third-and-26, only 26 yards or more would be considered a "success." The average success rate for Division-I college teams through week two of the 2009 college football season was 41.1 percent. Why is success rate important? In short, it measures a team's efficiency.

http://www2.kusports.com/definition/s_and_p/
Click to expand...
 
saunders45 said:
cm husker said:
saunders45 said:
commando said:
they have us at 25th after the poor season last year? maybe they think Nebraska has turned a corner and is on an upswing?
Click to expand...
These are purely analytical, so not really based on anyone's opinions (other than the weight given to metrics). They're not nearly as good as SBNation's S&P+ rankings IMO, but hey, it's the offseason.
Click to expand...

Do you have a link to those? Not familiar with them. Why do you prefer them?
Click to expand...
I prefer them because they're more accurate, and less "hand wavey" than ESPN's FPI.

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaa

Also, Bill Connelly (who created them) is simply a huge CFB dork, and I admire his work. I'm halfway through his first book, and helped kickstart his second.

They do all kinds of analytical studies on CFB at his main SBNation site: http://www.footballstudyhall.com/.

Also, his podcast is pretty good, they've been discussing a "moneyball" approach to CFB lately in regards to non Power 5 teams which has been quite interesting.
Click to expand...
Thanks much. I'll have to check out the podcast.

 
cm husker said:
saunders45 said:
cm husker said:
saunders45 said:
commando said:
they have us at 25th after the poor season last year? maybe they think Nebraska has turned a corner and is on an upswing?
Click to expand...
These are purely analytical, so not really based on anyone's opinions (other than the weight given to metrics). They're not nearly as good as SBNation's S&P+ rankings IMO, but hey, it's the offseason.
Click to expand...

Do you have a link to those? Not familiar with them. Why do you prefer them?
Click to expand...
I prefer them because they're more accurate, and less "hand wavey" than ESPN's FPI.

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaa

Also, Bill Connelly (who created them) is simply a huge CFB dork, and I admire his work. I'm halfway through his first book, and helped kickstart his second.

They do all kinds of analytical studies on CFB at his main SBNation site: http://www.footballstudyhall.com/.

Also, his podcast is pretty good, they've been discussing a "moneyball" approach to CFB lately in regards to non Power 5 teams which has been quite interesting.
Click to expand...
Thanks much. I'll have to check out the podcast.
Click to expand...
It's called "Podcast Ain't Played Nobody" and it is really good.

 
Back
Top