F
Fru
Guest
Slim Chicken's with Cayenne Ranch sauce.
I've had Canes two or three times, and I really don't understand the appeal. It's the same chicken parts/pieces you can get in a bag in your grocery store's freezer section. The only difference is that Canes fries it for you and has a sauce. I don't get why that's a thing worth getting excited about.
Here is Foodbeast's(?) top 10 from earlier this year:
- Popeyes
- Chick-fil-a
- Jollibee
- Church's
- Wingstop
- Shake Shack
- Cane's
- Bojangles
- Zaxby's
- KFC
Amen! It is good and stuff but it is nothing special.I've had Canes two or three times, and I really don't understand the appeal. It's the same chicken parts/pieces you can get in a bag in your grocery store's freezer section. The only difference is that Canes fries it for you and has a sauce. I don't get why that's a thing worth getting excited about.
I've had Canes two or three times, and I really don't understand the appeal. It's the same chicken parts/pieces you can get in a bag in your grocery store's freezer section. The only difference is that Canes fries it for you and has a sauce. I don't get why that's a thing worth getting excited about.
I can make better food at home, too. But aren't we comparing "Fast Food Chicken" here?
I'm responding with the mindset in my first post here, in that I don't understand why you'd want Canes at all.
To speak specifically to the premise of this thread, I prefer chicken with bones to gnaw, so for me that'd be something like KFC or Popeye's, but to be honest I've never had Popeye's, Church's, or any of the others who serve whole pieces, not tenders/fingers.
I've tried Chik-Fil-A and I am more amazed by the cult following they have than Canes. Again, it's good, it's just not magical.
I'd like to try Popeye's & Slim Chickens. @Fru what's so great about Slim?