Mavric
Yoda
Yeah, here's our PM conversation:
I moved some posts.
But you were the one who started it. Your first post in that thread accuses the OP of pulling stuff out of his butt. That isn't necessary and needs to stop.
Sorry. But it was accurate. Not literally, of course.![]()
For clarification, what I said was attacking what he said. I accused him of pulling stuff out of a$$, but I didn't call him an a$$. Attack the post, not the poster. Is that an accepted board philosophy?
The posts I reported were direct personal attacks, not attacks against something that was said.
Several people recently have tried to use "I was calling the post stupid, not the poster" or something like that. But it doesn't work that way. Saying "that's the dumbest post I've ever seen" is calling the poster dumb.
"Attack the post" isn't the way to go. If you disagree, you can make your own case for why they are wrong or ask for facts to back up their case. Saying a post is stupid or that they're pulling things out of their a$$ is attacking the poster.
I would say one was a personal attack and one wasn't. But when you start things like you're doing, we're not inclined to come down that hard on the responses.
Thanks. Got it, I think. If I would've left out the "pulled out of butt" part, I would've been OK.
Last edited by a moderator: