GBRedneck
Banned
Luckily, the courts are pretty clear on it. http://harvardlawreview.org/2014/04/does-the-second-amendment-protect-firearms-commerce/And people have differing opinions of what "keep" means.And?"Keep" means buy or acquire, and own. So obtaining them is part of the protected right. By definition, if you put limits on how they may obtain them, you are infringing on the right.The 2nd Amendment is the right to keep and bear arms. It says nothing about how a person has to go about obtaining them.I thought we were having a civilized discussion.Heaven forbid that all options should be on the table for a civilized discussion.![]()
But if you want to include all options for gun control, you need to first repeal the 2nd amendment. Then you can pass whatever kind of law you want without worrying about strict scrutiny and constitutional muster.
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2014/02/10/supreme-court-asked-to-clarify-what-it-means-to-bear-arms/
The Supreme Court in 2008 made it clear that the right to “keep” a gun is a personal right, and that it means one has a right to keep a functioning firearm for self-defense within the home.
How can you have an uninfringeable right to own a gun if you don't have the same right to acquire one?