So, from what I've read/watched from various new sites (if they can be trusted anymore) I have come up with the following "facts":
1. The shooting occurred in a "Gun Free Zone"
2. The precious minutes that it took the police to get there resulted in him being able to harm others.
3. This happened in a state that already has one of the highest restrictions placed upon firearms.
4. It happened with stolen weapons. They were not his.
5. The murderer exhibited extreme antisocial behavior and had a hatred for his mother.
6. Violent crime is at an all time low and gun ownership has increased dramatically. It's interesting to note that during the years in which Washington D.C. passed a handgun ban and trigger lock law, the murder rate averaged
73% higher than it was at the outset of the law. While the US murder rate averaged 11% lower the average.
http://www.justfacts.../guncontrol.asp
I fail to see how stricter gun laws would have prohibited this from happening.
There is a market for everything. The only thing gun control will do is keep the guns in the hands of people who want to commit violent crimes with firearms while keeping them out of the hands of the honest American who understands the responsibility of owning and operating a firearm.
Guns become a target because they're something concrete and tangible that the news outlets can use to direct Americans' blame. It's much harder to point the fingers to something intangible like a mental illness,which requires thought and intelligence to solve. Instead, we get the finger pointing in the easiest and dumbest way possible.
Guns have been around since elementary schools have been around. 60 years ago, I'm not aware of any shooting such as this ever occurring.
Have guns changed, or have people changed?