"Guys like myself, that's what we flock to."

[True2tRA]

I won't blame all the picks on him, but the "arm punt" stuff where he just seemed to go "F*** it, I'm going deep* and overthrew the receiver by 10 yards is on him. That's gotta stop.

"f#*k it, I'm going deep" is hardly the thought process in that situation.

I do agree, he needs to settle down a bit more but also, his offensive line needs to protect him a bit better.

I think maybe you need to look a little further into it than just Tommy saying "f#*k it, I'm going deep".

Why would Tommy try to throw the deep ball in the first place? The only time you'd launch one deep is if you have receivers streaking deep down the field every play? I mean, it's not like he was throwing the ball to nobody.

There were guys down there almost every play.

Why we feel the need to run 40+ yard routes every damn time we threw the ball? Do the receivers not know that they can turn around and come back to the ball?

Where is the thought process on that, where is the coaching? There was none. We just kept doing it over and over.

Can't be any clearer. I deleted the CAPS so it didn't sound like I was yelling at you. (so stupid) I deleted the curse words so it didn't come across that I'd been drinking, since you constantly run to the alcohol card when I'm stomping your argument in the mudhole.

 

[Saunders]

I won't blame all the picks on him, but the "arm punt" stuff where he just seemed to go "F*** it, I'm going deep* and overthrew the receiver by 10 yards is on him. That's gotta stop.

"f#*k it, I'm going deep" is hardly the thought process in that situation.

I do agree, he needs to settle down a bit more but also, his offensive line needs to protect him a bit better.

I think maybe you need to look a little further into it than just Tommy saying "f#*k it, I'm going deep".

Why would Tommy try to throw the deep ball in the first place? The only time you'd launch one deep is if you have receivers streaking deep down the field every play? I mean, it's not like he was throwing the ball to nobody.

There were guys down there almost every play.

Why we feel the need to run 40+ yard routes every damn time we threw the ball? Do the receivers not know that they can turn around and come back to the ball?

Where is the thought process on that, where is the coaching? There was none. We just kept doing it over and over.

Can't be any clearer. I deleted the CAPS so it didn't sound like I was yelling at you. (so stupid) I deleted the curse words so it didn't come across that I'd been drinking, since you constantly run to the alcohol card when I'm stomping your argument in the mudhole.

Actually, that's the first time I've ever used that particular retort in reference to you, so your assertion is false.

And once again, my post asking you about verts concepts answers most of your questions. Except for the "Tommy throwing it to nobody" part.

 

[Sargon]

"f#*k it, I'm going deep" is hardly the thought process in that situation. I do agree, he needs to settle down a bit more and his offensive line needs to protect him a bit better. But I think maybe you need to look a little further into it than just Tommy saying "f#*k it, I'm going deep". Why would Tommy try to throw the deep ball in the first place? The only time you'd launch one deep is if you have receivers streaking deep down the field every f'ing play. I mean, it's not like he was throwing the ball to nobody. There were guys down there almost every play. Why in Holy Hell did we feel the need to run 40+ yard routes every damn time we threw the ball? Do the receivers not know that they can turn around and come back to the ball? Where is the thought process on that, where is the coaching? There was NONE. We just kept doing it over and over and over and over................

You've never heard of the Verticals concept?

Man, that whole post went right over your head.

You and Mavric please, continue to try to oversimplify one of the most complicated team sports on this planet, please do, I get a laugh out of it.

Then please enlighten us to your point instead of rambling like a drunk uncle.

I'm going to report you to, er, you, for jfmb'ing.

Hey Saunders, look at this post from Saunders please. Let me know what you decide. Thanks.

 

[True2tRA]

I understand vertical concepts and I especially love hitting the seam with the slot WR or TE. Tommy missed a few of those TE vertical seam routes that would have been really big plays. (once again, True acknowledging there is fault with nearly everyone including Tommy, this will be ignored by many).

My argument wasn't against EVER (sorry, yelling at you again, I hope you're okay) going vertical, it was that it seemed we went to the well too many times. I recall seeing at least one or two receivers running very deep routes on almost 85% of our passing plays.

At what point do you reel it in, maybe put another blocker on the line (twin TE sets) to help your QB out, and run more short curls, quick outs, slants, or purely design some plays in which you move the pocket and limit the receiving options which would allow Tommy to make quicker reads or use his legs.

I'm no offensive coordinator, but these are things I would think of. It seemed the deep ball was over used, even when we didn't throw it deep, we still had WR's down the field far too often.

I've said this already. If you read my previous post that has you so confused, you'd see it places real emphasis on how often we did this, not the fact that we did it.

 

[Landlord]

At what point do you reel it in, maybe put another blocker on the line (twin TE sets) to help your QB out, and run more short curls, quick outs, slants, or purely design some plays in which you move the pocket and limit the receiving options which would allow Tommy to make quicker reads or use his legs.

I'm no offensive coordinator, but these are things I would think of. It seemed the deep ball was over used, even when we didn't throw it deep, we still had WR's down the field far too often.

You talk a lot about how we had so much miscommunication between our QB and WR's because of route trees, so if that is true, then a lot of this would probably fall on the receivers, wouldn't it?

Regardless, it seemed to work for us. Every voice is critical in hindsight, but we had a good (not great), balanced offense last year. Good for 13th in the nation.

 

[True2tRA]

At what point do you reel it in, maybe put another blocker on the line (twin TE sets) to help your QB out, and run more short curls, quick outs, slants, or purely design some plays in which you move the pocket and limit the receiving options which would allow Tommy to make quicker reads or use his legs.

I'm no offensive coordinator, but these are things I would think of. It seemed the deep ball was over used, even when we didn't throw it deep, we still had WR's down the field far too often.

You talk a lot about how we had so much miscommunication between our QB and WR's because of route trees, so if that is true, then a lot of this would probably fall on the receivers, wouldn't it?

Regardless, it seemed to work for us. Every voice is critical in hindsight, but we had a good (not great), balanced offense last year. Good for 13th in the nation.

It falls on a lot of things. QB, WR's, Coaches. Group effort really. I don't know what they worked on and how much they worked on but listening to people that do know, you get the impression they tried to do too much. It would explain why many things looked very sloppy.

Yea, we looked good sometimes. Other times not so good. Personally, I was very critical of somethings, and I have praised other things. I always felt like we had the potential to be better.

We never really took that next step and it was hard to find improvements from year to year, thus we are where we are.

 

[teachercd]

At what point do you reel it in, maybe put another blocker on the line (twin TE sets) to help your QB out, and run more short curls, quick outs, slants, or purely design some plays in which you move the pocket and limit the receiving options which would allow Tommy to make quicker reads or use his legs.

I'm no offensive coordinator, but these are things I would think of. It seemed the deep ball was over used, even when we didn't throw it deep, we still had WR's down the field far too often.

You talk a lot about how we had so much miscommunication between our QB and WR's because of route trees, so if that is true, then a lot of this would probably fall on the receivers, wouldn't it?

Regardless, it seemed to work for us. Every voice is critical in hindsight, but we had a good (not great), balanced offense last year. Good for 13th in the nation.

Was NU really 13th overall in offense last year?

 

[Sargon]

At what point do you reel it in, maybe put another blocker on the line (twin TE sets) to help your QB out, and run more short curls, quick outs, slants, or purely design some plays in which you move the pocket and limit the receiving options which would allow Tommy to make quicker reads or use his legs.

I'm no offensive coordinator, but these are things I would think of. It seemed the deep ball was over used, even when we didn't throw it deep, we still had WR's down the field far too often.

You talk a lot about how we had so much miscommunication between our QB and WR's because of route trees, so if that is true, then a lot of this would probably fall on the receivers, wouldn't it?

Regardless, it seemed to work for us. Every voice is critical in hindsight, but we had a good (not great), balanced offense last year. Good for 13th in the nation.

Was NU really 13th overall in offense last year?

How is that relevant?

YPP...NU was 29th at 6.0. tOSU was 5th, wisky 7th, Iowa 65th (5.4 ypp)

Passing is the topic. And the stats would need to be normalized to the strength of defenses opposed rating. Anyway,

https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/average-team-passer-rating

NU passer rating: 50th, 132.9

 

[teachercd]

At what point do you reel it in, maybe put another blocker on the line (twin TE sets) to help your QB out, and run more short curls, quick outs, slants, or purely design some plays in which you move the pocket and limit the receiving options which would allow Tommy to make quicker reads or use his legs.

I'm no offensive coordinator, but these are things I would think of. It seemed the deep ball was over used, even when we didn't throw it deep, we still had WR's down the field far too often.

You talk a lot about how we had so much miscommunication between our QB and WR's because of route trees, so if that is true, then a lot of this would probably fall on the receivers, wouldn't it?

Regardless, it seemed to work for us. Every voice is critical in hindsight, but we had a good (not great), balanced offense last year. Good for 13th in the nation.

Was NU really 13th overall in offense last year?

How is that relevant?

YPP...NU was 29th at 6.0. tOSU was 5th, wisky 7th, Iowa 65th (5.4 ypp)

Passing is the topic. And the stats would need to be normalized to the strength of defenses opposed rating. Anyway,

https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/average-team-passer-rating

NU passer rating: 50th, 132.9

And that is why I asked...I thought it seemed really really high.

How is it relevant? I don't know. I did not bring it up.

 

[Landlord]

At what point do you reel it in, maybe put another blocker on the line (twin TE sets) to help your QB out, and run more short curls, quick outs, slants, or purely design some plays in which you move the pocket and limit the receiving options which would allow Tommy to make quicker reads or use his legs.

I'm no offensive coordinator, but these are things I would think of. It seemed the deep ball was over used, even when we didn't throw it deep, we still had WR's down the field far too often.

You talk a lot about how we had so much miscommunication between our QB and WR's because of route trees, so if that is true, then a lot of this would probably fall on the receivers, wouldn't it?

Regardless, it seemed to work for us. Every voice is critical in hindsight, but we had a good (not great), balanced offense last year. Good for 13th in the nation.

Was NU really 13th overall in offense last year?

How is that relevant?

YPP...NU was 29th at 6.0. tOSU was 5th, wisky 7th, Iowa 65th (5.4 ypp)

Passing is the topic. And the stats would need to be normalized to the strength of defenses opposed rating. Anyway,

https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/average-team-passer-rating

NU passer rating: 50th, 132.9

And that is why I asked...I thought it seemed really really high.

How is it relevant? I don't know. I did not bring it up.

We were 13th in scoring.

 

[Sargon]

Lulz sorry I didnt read above I assumed you brought it up first (for no good reason). If one is actually interested to understand NU's offense last year it kinda went thusly.

Ameer was awesome.

The rest added up to medicore.

Kenny Bell was better than some critics think.

 

[Sargon]

Scoring is a lovely stat to be high in. One of the two best

However, it is obviously correlated to every aspect of the game (d scores, st scores, field position, snaps, opponents, overtimes, ............................

Might sound weird but if you want to use one stat to rank the offense, scoring would definitely not be the best choice.

 

[Red Five]

Kenny Bell was better than some critics think.

Good to see this thread getting back on track

 

[Scratchtown]

At what point do you reel it in, maybe put another blocker on the line (twin TE sets) to help your QB out, and run more short curls, quick outs, slants, or purely design some plays in which you move the pocket and limit the receiving options which would allow Tommy to make quicker reads or use his legs.

I'm no offensive coordinator, but these are things I would think of. It seemed the deep ball was over used, even when we didn't throw it deep, we still had WR's down the field far too often.

You talk a lot about how we had so much miscommunication between our QB and WR's because of route trees, so if that is true, then a lot of this would probably fall on the receivers, wouldn't it?

Regardless, it seemed to work for us. Every voice is critical in hindsight, but we had a good (not great), balanced offense last year. Good for 13th in the nation.

Was NU really 13th overall in offense last year?

How is that relevant?

YPP...NU was 29th at 6.0. tOSU was 5th, wisky 7th, Iowa 65th (5.4 ypp)

Passing is the topic. And the stats would need to be normalized to the strength of defenses opposed rating. Anyway,

https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/average-team-passer-rating

NU passer rating: 50th, 132.9

And that is why I asked...I thought it seemed really really high.How is it relevant? I don't know. I did not bring it up.

We were 13th in scoring.

Against who? Football stats are weird.

What were our opponents scoring defense numbers. Have to consider that when talking about that stuff.

Ya know cuz wisconsin had the #1 total defense in the country last year then got trounced when they actually played an offense with a pulse. To the tune of 59 points.

 

[Sargon]

Kenny Bell was better than some critics think.

Good to see this thread getting back on track

Touche'

(anyone know how to put the little thingy over the e? Back off track!!!!)