ZRod
Active member
which is why I said they were different cases and circumstances I was just using it as an example of the severity.USC and Boise St. both involved multiple sports at the same time.
Ohio State was just football.
Not disputing anything about the affects on recruiting.The allegations did in fact affect recruiting. We had decommits for this year. The sanctions already affected the institution as well (well at least the football program part of it). This would have been a national championship run year had Posey, Boom, Pryor, etc. been playing. Looks better for everyone involved? I guarantee you every single team that has had a regime change regardless of sanctions or not has used this waiver. Again, you're only hearing about it because it's Ohio State.
I would fully expect Tressel to receive a show cause and I don't think anyone is suggesting otherwise. And there isn't really another reason to charge a school with FTM other than not monitoring the athletes. The school failed to make sure athletes weren't affiliating with the booster and failed to educate athletes about the booster despite concerns relating to that booster. Yes it's a seperate case but it happened while they were already under a microscope and that doesn't look good in anyone's eyes outside of Columbus.You also don't know the full sanctions yet (last I heard, we will hear about them by Christmas) How do you know that Tressel (the only one proven to know anything about this) won't have a show cause put on him? The FTM wasn't monitoring the athletes. It was leveraged due to a single booster. The FTM had nothing to do with the tattoos. It had to do with jobs.
I don't dispute any of this, like I said before I think all their self imposed punishments are pretty righteous. The national championship and BCS claim is almost completely irrelevant there is no way to know what would have happened and they're still playing in a bowl game.As stated already, this was already a pretty steep punishment. Ohio State lost it's coach, it's star QB, those involved that are still playing lost a last push to impress NFL scouts. Posey had only one game in regular season to give NFL scouts something to watch. They lost out on what was almost assuredly a National Championship run or at least a BCS bowl (read millions of dollars)
I didn't write that out very clearly, what I meant was I don't agree with taking the post season away from people who had nothing to do with the violations (which is what would be happening if they do it now) and that foregoing the waiver wouldn't have a long lasting financial or performance hit on the university, especially with the name that they have now.You don't see how taking post season away would affect the institution? Loss of recruits, loss of money.
Last edited by a moderator: