I personally suspect that Bush isn't going to look nearly as good as he has all year versus Texas. I have a couple observations I would like to bring up and see what everyones thoughts are:
1) Why Ahman Green didn't get more push for the Heisman in 97.
2) LP's 94 season one of the greatest by a soph.....but didn't it look as good or better than Bush in 95???
3) Comparing Bush, LP, and Green (or can they be compared?).
BEST SEASONS RUSHING:
Ahman Green 97:
att: 278
Yards: 1925
avg: 6.8
tds: 22
LP 94:
att: 286
Yards: 1722
avg: 6.0
tds: 16
Bush 05:
att: 187
Yards: 1658
avg: 8.9
tds: 15
BEST YEAR RECEIVING STATS:
Bush: 383
LP: 175
AG: 105
Total Yards (receiving / rushing):
Bush: 2041
AG: 2030
LP: 1897
I think what this proves imo is that Bush was used in a more "versatile" way than either LP and or AG. LP did get a lot of pub for his 94 season and arguably had the Heisman won with his first couple of games in 95 (or clearly was every bit as good as Bush as a Jr and clearly the best player in the nation in 95). However I don't think his 94 season gets him to the level of AG and Bush's two best seasons. In regards to potential....I'd take LP any day minus the head issues. I know many huskers players that would verify this as well.
However I still can't believe that if you go to Heisman.com and AG's 97 season didn't even get him nominated.....because imo he was every bit as deserving as Bush in regards to rushing / receiving statistics show and not to mention had every bit as good of year as Ricky Williams did and he finished 5th in the voting that year:
Here the 97 nominees (and how they finished):
Woodson (won Heisman)
Manning
Leaf
Moss
Williams
Enis
Dwight
McNown
Couch
Zereoue
I have NO DOUBT that AG should've at least made the top 5 here considering:
Ricky Williams: 1893 yards with 25 tds
Ahman Green: 1925 yards with 22 tds
Only thing I can see is that with the year Frost had it took to much statistically away from Green.......with Frost running for over 1K....Green easily could've had 2K plus and close to 30 tds.
Thoughts?
The difference.....in regards to BUSH is that he returns punts, is used in a more open offense in which he lines up as a receiver and simply I fully admit, more versatile player (at the minimum used that way) and is clearly the player this year in college football.
But how does he rank with two of our most recent RB's.....that many consider some of our best ever.?
Weasel
1) Why Ahman Green didn't get more push for the Heisman in 97.
2) LP's 94 season one of the greatest by a soph.....but didn't it look as good or better than Bush in 95???
3) Comparing Bush, LP, and Green (or can they be compared?).
BEST SEASONS RUSHING:
Ahman Green 97:
att: 278
Yards: 1925
avg: 6.8
tds: 22
LP 94:
att: 286
Yards: 1722
avg: 6.0
tds: 16
Bush 05:
att: 187
Yards: 1658
avg: 8.9
tds: 15
BEST YEAR RECEIVING STATS:
Bush: 383
LP: 175
AG: 105
Total Yards (receiving / rushing):
Bush: 2041
AG: 2030
LP: 1897
I think what this proves imo is that Bush was used in a more "versatile" way than either LP and or AG. LP did get a lot of pub for his 94 season and arguably had the Heisman won with his first couple of games in 95 (or clearly was every bit as good as Bush as a Jr and clearly the best player in the nation in 95). However I don't think his 94 season gets him to the level of AG and Bush's two best seasons. In regards to potential....I'd take LP any day minus the head issues. I know many huskers players that would verify this as well.
However I still can't believe that if you go to Heisman.com and AG's 97 season didn't even get him nominated.....because imo he was every bit as deserving as Bush in regards to rushing / receiving statistics show and not to mention had every bit as good of year as Ricky Williams did and he finished 5th in the voting that year:
Here the 97 nominees (and how they finished):
Woodson (won Heisman)
Manning
Leaf
Moss
Williams
Enis
Dwight
McNown
Couch
Zereoue
I have NO DOUBT that AG should've at least made the top 5 here considering:
Ricky Williams: 1893 yards with 25 tds
Ahman Green: 1925 yards with 22 tds
Only thing I can see is that with the year Frost had it took to much statistically away from Green.......with Frost running for over 1K....Green easily could've had 2K plus and close to 30 tds.
Thoughts?
The difference.....in regards to BUSH is that he returns punts, is used in a more open offense in which he lines up as a receiver and simply I fully admit, more versatile player (at the minimum used that way) and is clearly the player this year in college football.
But how does he rank with two of our most recent RB's.....that many consider some of our best ever.?
Weasel
Last edited by a moderator: