The way you said it, was kind of a d!(k move. If you're going to dish it out that way prepare for the backlash.The part that got me, was you calling me a d!(k. You never stated before, about your evidence to support your arguement, until way after you calling me a d!(k and a few posts later. Your source, you have not even said who it was. My source is a very successful writer, who just obviously interviewed Micah and his family, who isn't known for making things up. I would love to look up more proof, but 5 years ago news, on a small town kid is not very easy to find, and with restrictions at work for internet, it even makes it that much more difficult.I cant believe it blew up into this. The your absolutely wrong, thanks... thing rubbed me the wrong way especially when i have some good evidence to support my arguement. If he has some evidence i would love to hear it, i can admit when im wrong, besides its second hand knowledge that ive read/heard more then once.
Anyway Knapp im not sure why you had to start this thread. Its just provoking us to not get along. We had a disagreement, it happens. I dont think you need to put us VS each other. I hope its a one time deal. I have always liked the way the guy posts, even when he posts paragraph long answers to everything.
Me telling him he was wrong, after him stating I was wrong was a d!(k move? Or at least he says he was talking about the article and not me, even though the article was saying the exact thing I was saying... So instead of people getting so damn butt hurt that they are wrong, they have to result in to calling people names is the right action and I should be prepared for that? Come onThe way you said it, was kind of a d!(k move. If you're going to dish it out that way prepare for the backlash.The part that got me, was you calling me a d!(k. You never stated before, about your evidence to support your arguement, until way after you calling me a d!(k and a few posts later. Your source, you have not even said who it was. My source is a very successful writer, who just obviously interviewed Micah and his family, who isn't known for making things up. I would love to look up more proof, but 5 years ago news, on a small town kid is not very easy to find, and with restrictions at work for internet, it even makes it that much more difficult.
:thumbs : it's this big!Nothing like a "My d!(k's bigger but you can't see it" contest on a Friday.:snacks:
The fact that he called you a d!(k has nothing to do with the actual substance of the argument.Me telling him he was wrong, after him stating I was wrong was a d!(k move? Or at least he says he was talking about the article and not me, even though the article was saying the exact thing I was saying... So instead of people getting so damn butt hurt that they are wrong, they have to result in to calling people names is the right action and I should be prepared for that? Come onThe way you said it, was kind of a d!(k move. If you're going to dish it out that way prepare for the backlash.The part that got me, was you calling me a d!(k. You never stated before, about your evidence to support your arguement, until way after you calling me a d!(k and a few posts later. Your source, you have not even said who it was. My source is a very successful writer, who just obviously interviewed Micah and his family, who isn't known for making things up. I would love to look up more proof, but 5 years ago news, on a small town kid is not very easy to find, and with restrictions at work for internet, it even makes it that much more difficult.
NOW, if he had proof, that we could all see, that I was wrong, then I would have apologized for disagreeing and I would have admitted I was wrong, but of course, that is not the case.
wow you are still on this, good lord man. Since we are still acting like babies..... I have more +1s than you so im right.Me telling him he was wrong, after him stating I wasThe way you said it, was kind of a d!(k move. If you're going to dish it out that way prepare for the backlash.The part that got me, was you calling me a d!(k. You never stated before, about your evidence to support your arguement, until way after you calling me a d!(k and a few posts later. Your source, you have not even said who it was. My source is a very successful writer, who just obviously interviewed Micah and his family, who isn't known for making things up. I would love to look up more proof, but 5 years ago news, on a small town kid is not very easy to find, and with restrictions at work for internet, it even makes it that much more difficult.
wrong was a d!(k move? Or at least he says he was talking about the article and not me, even though the article was saying the exact thing I was saying... So instead of people getting so damn butt hurt that they are wrong, they have to result in to calling people names is the right action and I should be prepared for that? Come on
NOW, if he had proof, that we could all see, that I was wrong, then I would have apologized for disagreeing and I would have admitted I was wrong, but of course, that is not the case.
But you kill ponies.. so you are a mean person..wow you are still on this, good lord man. Since we are still acting like babies..... I have more +1s than you so im right.Me telling him he was wrong, after him stating I wasThe way you said it, was kind of a d!(k move. If you're going to dish it out that way prepare for the backlash.The part that got me, was you calling me a d!(k. You never stated before, about your evidence to support your arguement, until way after you calling me a d!(k and a few posts later. Your source, you have not even said who it was. My source is a very successful writer, who just obviously interviewed Micah and his family, who isn't known for making things up. I would love to look up more proof, but 5 years ago news, on a small town kid is not very easy to find, and with restrictions at work for internet, it even makes it that much more difficult.
wrong was a d!(k move? Or at least he says he was talking about the article and not me, even though the article was saying the exact thing I was saying... So instead of people getting so damn butt hurt that they are wrong, they have to result in to calling people names is the right action and I should be prepared for that? Come on
NOW, if he had proof, that we could all see, that I was wrong, then I would have apologized for disagreeing and I would have admitted I was wrong, but of course, that is not the case.
But you kill ponies.. so you are a mean person..wow you are still on this, good lord man. Since we are still acting like babies..... I have more +1s than you so im right.Me telling him he was wrong, after him stating I wasThe way you said it, was kind of a d!(k move. If you're going to dish it out that way prepare for the backlash.The part that got me, was you calling me a d!(k. You never stated before, about your evidence to support your arguement, until way after you calling me a d!(k and a few posts later. Your source, you have not even said who it was. My source is a very successful writer, who just obviously interviewed Micah and his family, who isn't known for making things up. I would love to look up more proof, but 5 years ago news, on a small town kid is not very easy to find, and with restrictions at work for internet, it even makes it that much more difficult.
wrong was a d!(k move? Or at least he says he was talking about the article and not me, even though the article was saying the exact thing I was saying... So instead of people getting so damn butt hurt that they are wrong, they have to result in to calling people names is the right action and I should be prepared for that? Come on
NOW, if he had proof, that we could all see, that I was wrong, then I would have apologized for disagreeing and I would have admitted I was wrong, but of course, that is not the case.
YOU LOSE
Wow dude, i didnt disagree with you. Did you write the story?You guys are funny. Do you hold Fowler's hand while he pees too Lyon? Seriously, if you can justify for anyone to call anyone a name for a simple disagreement, then I don't know what else to say here.
He disagreed with something I said, I did the same back, he called me a d!(k. Sounds like it was well deserved. You are sooooo right! Just because I am a newer guy, I am always wrong, and know nothing. You vets stick together, even when one was being a complete a$$hole, I get it.
This convo should have never gotten to where it did, but due to personal attacks towards me, it did. Since when did it become someone being a "d!(k" for telling someone they were wrong WHEN THEY CLEARLY F'ING WERE?
Although this is really funny, by creating this it just keeps the fight (miscommunication) going. Thats what im getting at. I come on here 4 hours later and the guy is still upset, and it starts all over again ( i have no idea why) Now it goes from a simple miscommunication to probably never getting along again, causing future problems. Just say'n.