Hypothetical Pelini Replacement

[OrderKindOfAlmostRestored]

The mention of TO was for entertainment purposes, which obviously didn't get through to the "anti-everything-but-Pelini" crowd, but I certainly wouldn't be opposed to his return.

 

[JJ Husker]

Sorry Kindofalmost, I shouldn't have taken out my frustration on your post. I'm just tired of the seemingly limitless topics that pop up after a tough loss. I mean how many things do we have to dissect? Our problem seems pretty limited to our defense to me. I do question the value of multiple angles on whats wrong with Pelini especially when our lines are soft and the first two layers of our D are downright pathetic. And yes do hold Bo accountable for that to a certain extent. But not enough to start yet another angle on how/who/when should he be replaced.

 

[C N Red]

Sorry Kindofalmost, I shouldn't have taken out my frustration on your post. I'm just tired of the seemingly limitless topics that pop up after a tough loss. I mean how many things do we have to dissect? Our problem seems pretty limited to our defense to me. I do question the value of multiple angles on whats wrong with Pelini especially when our lines are soft and the first two layers of our D are downright pathetic. And yes do hold Bo accountable for that to a certain extent. But not enough to start yet another angle on how/who/when should he be replaced.

If there wasnt limitless topics to grind over after a loss, or even a win, then there would be no message boards. Then what in the hell would we all do?!?!

 

[walksalone]

since folks are "going out on a limb" with their choices, here are two of mine...

 

[huskerXman]

Wow, what a stupid thread...no offense to the originator.

 

[sd'sker]

i wonder if we could get urban meyer?

 

[NUinID]

If you really want a good coach that gets his team ready to play and works wonders with what he has. Paul Rhoads of ISU is your man. He would be a great hire for any school IMO

 

[Count 'Bility]

Sorry Kindofalmost, I shouldn't have taken out my frustration on your post. I'm just tired of the seemingly limitless topics that pop up after a tough loss. I mean how many things do we have to dissect? Our problem seems pretty limited to our defense to me. I do question the value of multiple angles on whats wrong with Pelini especially when our lines are soft and the first two layers of our D are downright pathetic. And yes do hold Bo accountable for that to a certain extent. But not enough to start yet another angle on how/who/when should he be replaced.

If there wasnt limitless topics to grind over after a loss, or even a win, then there would be no message boards. Then what in the hell would we all do?!?!

pfff. I would do my job to start. :wacko: