The Constitution is quite clear on the word "born", so I don't see any way that Trump's EO could supercede it.Per my (limited) understanding, it sadly doesn't seem quite certain that Trump's EO would directly contradict the 14th amendment. I'm also not sure there is any actual past legal precedent as far as illegal immigrant's children?
Per my (limited) understanding, it sadly doesn't seem quite certain that Trump's EO would directly contradict the 14th amendment. I'm also not sure there is any actual past legal precedent as far as illegal immigrant's children?
During the debate over the first clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, he [The author of the 14th amendment] argued for including the phrase "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof:"
[The 14th amendment] will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of person.[2]
Finally a Senator willing to put his face on an issue that really isn't a problem and doesn't need fixing. I'm glad we are distracted from realnissies like the deficit, Russian interference, healthcare, better tax reform, consumer rights, social safety nets, drug prices, common sense gun laws, etc.
idk how much it actually matters, but per wikipedia:
"Per Wikipedia"
:facepalm: Okay, Per Wikipedia, sourced from the Library of Congress' records:
http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=073/llcg073.db&recNum=11
Doesn't really matter who wanted what in which Amendment because only what's in the actual Amendment got ratified by the States.idk how much it actually matters, but per wikipedia: