Oh i thought you meant the coach for a second.MRI, M Newby and Weber will play. Young still questionable.
Reilly questionable - didn't practice today.
If foster didn't play this season it seems like he would be eligible for the medical redshirt right? Or did he lose that by practicing?That's incorrect. Foster could still play and be eligible for the redshirt.I thought that was the story but according to Sean Callahan last week you have to show that you've missed TWO seasons due to injury to get a medical hardship.Not sure if this is being discussed anywhere else but wouldn't Foster be in line for a medical redshirt right now? Can they still play him for a couple of games at the end of the season and still get this done?
http://www.fromtherumbleseat.com/georgia-tech-football/2015/10/7/9457847/football-the-medical-redshirt-explainedHow does a player obtain a medical redshirt?
A player obtains a medical redshirt by applying for one through the NCAA following a season when they meet each of the following requirements:
- The player must have suffered an injury during their senior year of high school, or during one of their four eligible seasons for college competition. (This does not provide for players who are already redshirting a season and are injured in practice.)
- The injury suffered must be "incapacitating", meaning it must be a season-ending injury.
- The injury must occur during the first half of the season.
- The player must have competed in no more than 30% of the season or four games, whichever is greater.
Edit: I guess since the injury isn't technically "season ending" there may be some gray area there that would DQ him. I wonder if he doesn't play the rest of the year if he would still be eligible or if he's already ineligible because he's possibly able to play again?
Eligible yes. But it sounds like he would have to miss a second year due to injury to be able to expect to get one (you can't apply until after your fifth year).If foster didn't play this season it seems like he would be eligible for the medical redshirt right? Or did he lose that by practicing?
It sounds like the staff is skeptical he would be granted a 6th year if they brought him back at all at the end of the season. With the amount of doubt and because of the timing of the injury which allows him to participate at the end of the year (rather then playing in the first two games and then being injured) I now don't think its a good idea to sit him if he is ready. Let him play and lets try to get to a better bowl game.Eligible yes. But it sounds like he would have to miss a second year due to injury to be able to expect to get one (you can't apply until after your fifth year).If foster didn't play this season it seems like he would be eligible for the medical redshirt right? Or did he lose that by practicing?
Seems like him playing would pretty much kill that possibility.
This crack me up ......... Nebraska seems like they are down to 4th string guy when Fyfe goes in.No reason to play games with Maryland. They can look at film and figure out that if Tommy is playing, they have to focused on his running and throwing. If it is Fyfe, then you put extra 'good hands' guys in to be sure and catch those bad passes just in case he does throw it before the sack happens. Otherwise, tackle the running backs every play. Oops, that is a little unfair but gosh we just don't have much offense at all without Tommy in my view. Maybe Fyfe has more skill that we've seen - apparently so if he is supposed to be our second best QB.
I will admit, I am not confident in Fyfe's abilities.... At least what I have seen this far of his limited playing time. If he is starting, I'd quickly identify passes he can accurately throw, with limited reads and have the RB as the safety valve on all passing plays. TA was not 70% last week because he magically got better. Langs, after a painful 4 game stretch IMHO, called passes TA can complete with a great deal of confidence and accuracy.This crack me up ......... Nebraska seems like they are down to 4th string guy when Fyfe goes in.No reason to play games with Maryland. They can look at film and figure out that if Tommy is playing, they have to focused on his running and throwing. If it is Fyfe, then you put extra 'good hands' guys in to be sure and catch those bad passes just in case he does throw it before the sack happens. Otherwise, tackle the running backs every play. Oops, that is a little unfair but gosh we just don't have much offense at all without Tommy in my view. Maybe Fyfe has more skill that we've seen - apparently so if he is supposed to be our second best QB.
He's obviously head and shoulders above Fyfe, but on a bad leg I don't think he's better. Tommy who can't run and Tommy who can't use his feet while he's throwing is not going to be able to do much.You have to think if the decision is up to Tommy, he'd be out there even in a full body cast. That man is nothing but cast iron nut from top to bottom.
Oh, I agree with you...just saying, if it was strictly up to him.....He's obviously head and shoulders above Fyfe, but on a bad leg I don't think he's better. Tommy who can't run and Tommy who can't use his feet while he's throwing is not going to be able to do much.You have to think if the decision is up to Tommy, he'd be out there even in a full body cast. That man is nothing but cast iron nut from top to bottom.