You may be right. If he is hampered by a nagging injury that a week off would help...start Fyfe and keep Tommy ready to go if needed.It's possible...I'm just saying "possible" that our best chance to get to Indy is to start Fyfe if Armstrong is relatively hampered by the hamstring injury.
Throw the WR screens just like we did against Minnesota. Run some tosses to the outside, the jet sweeps, some reverses. If we're in trouble at halftime, bring Tommy into the game.
But can you imagine playing Iowa with a relatively injured Armstrong? That would be bad. I realize how risky this seems against Maryland to start Fyfe, but how do we beat Iowa with an injured Armstrong?
Agree with the game plan you mentioned. As I said above, identify what Fyfe can do and do it. I liked the screen game against Minnie to get them out of the box. Use motion to pull a lb out of the box. A healthy Oz will help to blast into that DL. If Fyfe can hit those passes, that'd be the way to go. Let him be a game manager and simply distribute the ball to the play makers. Almost a mantra of all we need you to do is not lose......manage the game. Limit mistakes and don't go for a single game record of INT's. Throw the ball away and let the D win.....It's possible...I'm just saying "possible" that our best chance to get to Indy is to start Fyfe if Armstrong is relatively hampered by the hamstring injury.
Throw the WR screens just like we did against Minnesota. Run some tosses to the outside, the jet sweeps, some reverses. If we're in trouble at halftime, bring Tommy into the game.
But can you imagine playing Iowa with a relatively injured Armstrong? That would be bad. I realize how risky this seems against Maryland to start Fyfe, but how do we beat Iowa with an injured Armstrong?
The key is identifying what Fyfe can do. In the passing game, from the plays this season, I too am unsure what those would be. I would hope that in year 2, Langs can figure something out.Assuming that Fyfe can throw screen passes is quite an assumption.
I can't even recall the last time I saw him complete a pass period. It's like his definition of success (I don't mean to rag on the kid because I'm sure he gives just as much devotion as anyone) is to just succeed in the fact of throwing the ball to a general area, with no thought towards actual, you know, completions.
Last game he played he had a higher completion percentage than TA.Assuming that Fyfe can throw screen passes is quite an assumption.
I can't even recall the last time I saw him complete a pass period. It's like his definition of success (I don't mean to rag on the kid because I'm sure he gives just as much devotion as anyone) is to just succeed in the fact of throwing the ball to a general area, with no thought towards actual, you know, completions.
With equal number of Pick-6's thrown.Last game he played he had a higher completion percentage than TA.Assuming that Fyfe can throw screen passes is quite an assumption.
I can't even recall the last time I saw him complete a pass period. It's like his definition of success (I don't mean to rag on the kid because I'm sure he gives just as much devotion as anyone) is to just succeed in the fact of throwing the ball to a general area, with no thought towards actual, you know, completions.
WrongLast game he played he had a higher completion percentage than TA.Assuming that Fyfe can throw screen passes is quite an assumption.
I can't even recall the last time I saw him complete a pass period. It's like his definition of success (I don't mean to rag on the kid because I'm sure he gives just as much devotion as anyone) is to just succeed in the fact of throwing the ball to a general area, with no thought towards actual, you know, completions.