Thanks for the info....very interesting!
--Now if you'll excuse me while I wander into the weeds--
I am unaware if he has already crunched the numbers, but I did some below:
2017 Big Ten average Defense vs. Pace of Play (basically the offensive speed of playcalling) = #65.83/128 with a median of 77/128
2017 SEC average Defense vs. Pace of Play (basically the offensive speed of playcalling) = #92.2/128 with a median of 101/128
I would put this forward as evidence that the average SEC team defense probably face more conventional (at least in terms of speed of playcalling) offenses, and that they also most likely face far fewer snaps during a year. This could contribute to a team being healthier/have more endurance at the end of the year.
Does anyone have any data showing snaps faced vs. Team Defense Health or snaps made vs. Team Offensive Health at end of season? I would be interested in knowing if this is negligible, or significant. Is there any data that team defenses that have not faced a top 30 offensive team (in terms of pace of play) struggle more, less, or the same?
A final question, does the Nebraska Athletic department have anybody looking at statistical analysis of things like this? I am certainly not advocating a "Moneyball" approach to college football, but statistical data could inform some of a coach's (Frost's) decisions? For instance, is there a point at which the pace of play becomes negligible to effecting a defense? For instance is the difference between an 15 second and 18 second snap negligible, but 18 seconds rather than a 21 second snap is very significant?