I agree they are getting more out of their players than we are, but how is Newby more talented than Wadley? - because he attended more camps in HS and got the higher rating? I just don't like the fact a person is automatically better because some recruiting service says so. Don't get me wrong, overall Nebraska has recruited better than Iowa, but the players on the field today aren't as good at this current moment.
Wadley had one cut back and took it 75 yards - something Newby hasn't done in his whole career.
If I'm building a team, and I don't know any of your fancy stats - yes, I take Nebraska's players every time.
You must really think that Mike Riley has under performed then. 0-4 vs the teams we have to beat if we ever want to win the West. Two teams that we have way more talent than they do.
Newby did that at Northwestern, he just managed to fumble.
Yes, Newby is much more talented than Wadley. Not only did one recruiting site rank him higher, EVERY recruiting site did. He played much better competition and put up ridiculous stats.
Running Back A: 105 carries, 1548yds, 14.7 YPC, 129 yds/gm, 29 TDs
Running Back B: 301 carries, 2305yds, 7.7 YPC, 165 yds/gm, 45 TDs
Running Back B played better competition. Both want to come to your school and you have 1 scholarship. I'm taking B.
Yes, Mike Riley has underperformed. I think that is the general sentiment, or at least it should be.