JUCO DT Tony Fair [UAB Commit]

[Warrior10]

Pushed his decision back, possibly still this summer. Still very interested in Neb. OV planned for Colo game.  

 

[Ziebol]

Announcing commitment tomorrow morning. 

 

[ADS]

Without visiting still a little skeptical.

 

[The Murphinator]

[No message]

 

[Warrior10]

CB from Indy guy, that is good. 

 

[Savage Husker]

Ron Brown effect 

 

[Huskers93-97]

Serious question for someone. This guy is a monster 330 pound defensive tackle. JUCO All American. How is the kid not even rated in 247 composite? 

 

[BIG ERN]

All I know is this kid had 25 tackles in one game last year as a DT.....pretty damn incredible to get 98 tackles in 9 games. JUCO level or not he can play

 

[NoLongerN]

Serious question for someone. This guy is a monster 330 pound defensive tackle. JUCO All American. How is the kid not even rated in 247 composite? 

That's a pretty silly question.  They only rate great, good and poor DT prospects.  This guy is just fair.

 

[Day by Day]

That's a pretty silly question.  They only rate great, good and poor DT prospects.  This guy is just fair.

I see what you did there. 

 

[Huskers93-97]

That's a pretty silly question.  They only rate great, good and poor DT prospects.  This guy is just fair.

 

[ADS]

Wiltfong husk CB

 

[Savage Husker]

Wiltfong husk CB

Not trashing on your post, but this is an example of why I’ve come to dislike the “CB” these days. It has little to nothing to do with prediction. Splitting hairs? Perhaps. A name change that fits whatever these recruiting gurus are predicting would minimalize this pet peeve I've developed, but that’s just my personal problem. 

Carry on.

Woohoo, we’re getting a recruit at a position of need!

 

[NoLongerN]

Well, that prediction ought to satisfy those fair-weathered fans!

 

[Thanks_Tom RR]

Not trashing on your post, but this is an example of why I’ve come to dislike the “CB” these days. It has little to nothing to do with prediction. Splitting hairs? Perhaps. A name change that fits whatever these recruiting gurus are predicting would minimalize this pet peeve I've developed, but that’s just my personal problem. 

Carry on.

Woohoo, we’re getting a recruit at a position of need!

Maybe they should have a deadline for changing or locking in predictions that is retroactive to the commitment. Say, a week or so. Many times you see "predictions" flying in with a day (or a few hours) before a commitment. Not much of a prediction, if you hear about a commitment before it becomes public.