hell no.... maybe your chicks are craigslist junkers but my chick don't look like that... sure she don't wake up looking like some chick on a 1950's TV show but she don't look like a Dade county crackwhore either.. the point is i guess makeup makes her look extremely hot... add on her pretty big natural tits and she is a star... but in actuality the chick is below average in my opinion
Ohh, it exists and it is not at all unrealistic.hell no.... maybe your chicks are craigslist junkers but my chick don't look like that... sure she don't wake up looking like some chick on a 1950's TV show but she don't look like a Dade county crackwhore either.. the point is i guess makeup makes her look extremely hot... add on her pretty big natural tits and she is a star... but in actuality the chick is below average in my opinion
I wont' say you're wrong, but I will say that in our culture we are socially conditioned to expect an unrealistic and non-existent standard of beauty in women as a default
Okay but the plus size models still undergo digitual manipulations to their proportions in print, and even the "special unique mumbo jumbo" models are still airbrushed (not having pores and blemishes is unrealistic, since all human skin has both) and treated with all kinds of makeup to enhance their appearance. Women in almost any western country are expected to externally enhance their beauty, and god forbid they decide to do something as outrageous as refrain from shaving their legs or armpits. You don't think it's unrealistic to expect a person to look differently than they are naturally supposed to?I'm sorry that the same poisonous American media that flaunts these "unrealistic" standards has also brainwashed many into thinking that "real women have curves" and "Chuck Taylors are preferable to high heels", "everyone is special JUST the way they are" and all of the other mumbo jumbo. Leave America for a few months and try to say that that standard is unrealistic.
I agreeOkay but the plus size models still undergo digitual manipulations to their proportions in print, and even the "special unique mumbo jumbo" models are still airbrushed (not having pores and blemishes is unrealistic, since all human skin has both) and treated with all kinds of makeup to enhance their appearance. Women in almost any western country are expected to externally enhance their beauty, and God forbid they decide to do something as outrageous as refrain from shaving their legs or armpits. You don't think it's unrealistic to expect a person to look differently than they are naturally supposed to?I'm sorry that the same poisonous American media that flaunts these "unrealistic" standards has also brainwashed many into thinking that "real women have curves" and "Chuck Taylors are preferable to high heels", "everyone is special JUST the way they are" and all of the other mumbo jumbo. Leave America for a few months and try to say that that standard is unrealistic.
Pics or it didn't happen! This is the SKIN THREAD DAMMIT!!!!I agreeOkay but the plus size models still undergo digitual manipulations to their proportions in print, and even the "special unique mumbo jumbo" models are still airbrushed (not having pores and blemishes is unrealistic, since all human skin has both) and treated with all kinds of makeup to enhance their appearance. Women in almost any western country are expected to externally enhance their beauty, and God forbid they decide to do something as outrageous as refrain from shaving their legs or armpits. You don't think it's unrealistic to expect a person to look differently than they are naturally supposed to?I'm sorry that the same poisonous American media that flaunts these "unrealistic" standards has also brainwashed many into thinking that "real women have curves" and "Chuck Taylors are preferable to high heels", "everyone is special JUST the way they are" and all of the other mumbo jumbo. Leave America for a few months and try to say that that standard is unrealistic.
I don't either, but my crotch does!!I never know what my wife's face looks like in the morning.This is what EVERY woman looks close to when they wake up in the morning.![]()
this is what you wake up to....... good ol katy without all that makeup.... with makeup yeah sure why not id take a dip in her pooh hole/stench trench/ or explore her doodoo wall
![]()
Am I reading this right? Are you advocating women stop shaving pits and legs?Okay but the plus size models still undergo digitual manipulations to their proportions in print, and even the "special unique mumbo jumbo" models are still airbrushed (not having pores and blemishes is unrealistic, since all human skin has both) and treated with all kinds of makeup to enhance their appearance. Women in almost any western country are expected to externally enhance their beauty, and god forbid they decide to do something as outrageous as refrain from shaving their legs or armpits. You don't think it's unrealistic to expect a person to look differently than they are naturally supposed to?I'm sorry that the same poisonous American media that flaunts these "unrealistic" standards has also brainwashed many into thinking that "real women have curves" and "Chuck Taylors are preferable to high heels", "everyone is special JUST the way they are" and all of the other mumbo jumbo. Leave America for a few months and try to say that that standard is unrealistic.
Am I reading this right? Are you advocating women stop shaving pits and legs?
On the heels of "DeflateGate"...And me living almost exactly an hour away from this year's Super Bowl (40 minutes if the traffic is light)..I consider it my Civic Duty to volunteer to check Katy Perry's pressure...Mammary or otherwise ...before she performs in the Halftime Show...No matter how awful that type of muzac is....