I never even implied that he tried to "set Riley straight."
I was simply saying that as a single piece of evidence, among many, that NU is unique (or disadvantaged) based on its circumstances and the system needs to be adapted to that uniqueness. TO has on numorous occasions had talked (and written) about those circumstances and the reasons he refined and shaped his system the way he did.
I find it interesting that so many people on here apparently think we can do whatever we want and model ourselves after whomever we want and we'll be more successful than everyone else.
I think NU can get back to being a .700 program doing things that way, but I don't see NU getting to .800+ doing that.
I was simply saying that as a single piece of evidence, among many, that NU is unique (or disadvantaged) based on its circumstances and the system needs to be adapted to that uniqueness. TO has on numorous occasions had talked (and written) about those circumstances and the reasons he refined and shaped his system the way he did.
I find it interesting that so many people on here apparently think we can do whatever we want and model ourselves after whomever we want and we'll be more successful than everyone else.
I think NU can get back to being a .700 program doing things that way, but I don't see NU getting to .800+ doing that.