runningblind
New member
Sign him up for left tackle then.He LOVES blocking people.
I do think he is good on the radio though...I wonder if he will come back full time.
Sign him up for left tackle then.He LOVES blocking people.
I do think he is good on the radio though...I wonder if he will come back full time.
Scott was simply in over his head. He probably succumbed to some pressures involving those in the circle that he associated with. He was accustomed to cutting softer wood so to speak then after arriving here things were substantially more tough. He was overwhelmed and didn’t have enough answers to overcome various hurdles.
It’s evident that we’ve made a number of mistakes with respect to coaching hires. Is there something broken at Nebraska? Perhaps it has something to do with influential involved in decision making processes? It’s not just the athletic directors that we like to tear apart.
That’s just my perspective. People had better take a good hard look at how they’re operating is adversely effecting what’s in our interest. We have got to get this one right.
The favor is for us...because it means no Vrzal show!
I gotcha. Fine i will say Scott's gone. Focus your time and energy into something that is present and not in the past. Lets move on to Oklahoma game and see if the defense is going to be better.The focus of us on this here message board has nothing to do with "figuring out how to get a elite coach".
I gotcha. Fine i will say Scott's gone. Focus your time and energy into something that is present and not in the past. Lets move on to Oklahoma game and see if the defense is going to be better.
My father believes he needed more time. Believes the mess was really bad to clean up and he got a rough hand dealt with the lightning opening and then covid. I would add the transfer portal changed things too.Is the native son thing still a narrative right now though? I haven’t seen, heard or encountered one instance of someone thinking Scott shouldn’t have been fired.
I also think TO’s influence or
opinion gets drastically overestimated.
I think after roughly 40 years of success, the collective mindset was unprepared for what happened in 2002. It was such an outlier of a season, that no one knew how to handle it. You look at the history of every other blue blood from 1970 to 2002, all of them had a handful of down years. They knew that winning wasn’t always guaranteed and also not to panic when it happens.It’s evident that we’ve made a number of mistakes with respect to coaching hires. Is there something broken at Nebraska? Perhaps it has something to do with influential involved in decision making processes? It’s not just the athletic directors that we like to tear apart.
I was surprised to hear the things he said, and it also explains a lot. After the disorganized clusterf#&% I watched on Saturdays the last 4+ years it checks out that the program he ran was a disorganized clusterf#&%.
I almost feel vindicated for calling some of the nonsense into question, but it's not time to gloat. It's time for all of us to rally around coach Mickey and hope for the best.
Agree. I will say that Moos went out and hired the coaches almost everyone wanted. He got the hot coach at the time. It didn't work out for either of them. Now, maybe part of that is because Moos didn't manage them well once they were here. That very well could be. One is fired and the other probably will be unless the BB program makes a massive turnaround this year. I doubt that they do.AD wise… Pederson was impulsive and unprepared. TO was never going to be the long term solution. Eichorst was emblematic of Perlman’s meddling. Moos was also not a long term solution and was seemingly asleep at the wheel.
Trev finally seems to be the steady leader we’ve needed for decades.
Facebook, a lot of people who are "older"