FrantzHardySwag
New member
Seriously. Bowl eligibility on the line, team that has had your number, conf game, possibly your coaches job on the line…and you can’t get up for it? Jesus.Not acceptable. Period.
Seriously. Bowl eligibility on the line, team that has had your number, conf game, possibly your coaches job on the line…and you can’t get up for it? Jesus.Not acceptable. Period.
Chance to prove all your doubters wrong.Seriously. Bowl eligibility on the line, team that has had your number, conf game, possibly your coaches job on the line…and you can’t get up for it? Jesus.
We are 99th in red zone. 5-17 in 1 loss games. A QB who leads (in bottom) of TO's........Our losing record.....All of this is a reflection of our play calling, development, coaching etc...That's all on coaching. Why did we fire Riley> Pelini? Cally? Solich? Because their players failed to execute or the HC failed to execute......It doesn’t matter what the play call is if the players don’t execute it.
Yant should have a TD
should have 4 points on two easy kicks.
WR gotta catch the ball when they get two hands on it.
Do those simple things and we win this game. None of those things failed because of a bad play call.
I thought he took a helmet to helmet hit after he hit Betts for a 3rd down completion in the 4th quarter. Probably wouldn't have made a difference, but i thought it could have been called.Did anyone else think AM took 2 helmet to helmet shots? I dont think they were egregious…or the type that I would say were malicious intent, but I swear he took 2 shots high that should have been looked at.
Not a complaint about why we lost, but we’ve seen reviews against us for less.
Yeah, I thought he took one earlier in the game too. I guess I am trying to understand why we don’t try to get those calls for our advantage since it’s part of the game now.I thought he took a helmet to helmet hit after he hit Betts for a 3rd down completion in the 4th quarter. Probably wouldn't have made a difference, but i thought it could have been called.