NCAA in "Deep Discussion" to Implement Revenue Sharing with Athletes

[Mavric]

This would change things.

 

[Mavric]

[No message]

 

[Mavric]

[No message]

 

[Mavric]

[No message]

 

[Mavric]

[No message]

 

[Mavric]

[No message]

 

[Mavric]

[No message]

 

[Mavric]

[No message]

 

[Mavric]

[No message]

 

[BigRedBuster]

This would change things.

Geee….ya think?

but….a little late for a lot of them. 

 

[krc1995]

Geee….ya think?

but….a little late for a lot of them. 

Talk about ruining the lives of the athletes they were to “protect”. 
 

maybe schools jumped ship a little fast. Or the athletes. Stupid of the NCAA to demand limits so quickly and without court approval. 

 

[BigRedBuster]

Talk about ruining the lives of the athletes they were to “protect”. 
 

maybe schools jumped ship a little fast. Or the athletes. Stupid of the NCAA to demand limits so quickly and without court approval. 

And...have at least a few years of phasing it in.

 

[krc1995]

And...have at least a few years of phasing it in.

And really should be a function of conferences and not the NCAA. They’re just really trying to find some relevancy.  
 

but I will say Olivia Dunn arguing that the settlement is not enough is borderline on the other side too. At least that was my take on her testimony.  So confusing. Too much packed into one antitrust settlement. 

 

[Mavric]

[No message]

 

[ZRod]

It's like they want to kill the Association. At every possible turn over the last few decades the NCAA has seemingly chosen the worst path for athletes and the sport. Again, the judge is telling them what they're doing is wrong, but they don't listen.