NCAA in "Deep Discussion" to Implement Revenue Sharing with Athletes

[Mavric]

[No message]

 

[BigRedBuster]

Oooops!!!

 

[TGHusker]

Oooops!!!

My goodness - how does one to that.   I guess they really needed that NC money.   Paying $20m in NIL, if true, adds up pretty quickly.  

 

[Mavric]

[No message]

 

[soup]

My goodness - how does one to that.   I guess they really needed that NC money.   Paying $20m in NIL, if true, adds up pretty quickly.  

FYI this was for 2023, not 2024. Or whatever their fiscal year operates under.

 

[caveman99]

My goodness - how does one to that.   I guess they really needed that NC money.   Paying $20m in NIL, if true, adds up pretty quickly.  

FYI this was for 2023, not 2024. Or whatever their fiscal year operates under.

Also NIL doesn’t come from the school so that wouldn’t have contributed to this deficit. 

 

[Mavric]

[No message]

 

[Mavric]

[No message]

 

[Mavric]

[No message]

 

[Mavric]

[No message]

 

[Mavric]

[No message]

 

[Notre Dame Joe]

Also NIL doesn’t come from the school so that wouldn’t have contributed to this deficit. 

Well, not directly.

 

[Mavric]

Word is there are expected to be a total of about 80 Husker athletes who get revenue sharing dollars.  Speculation is that may be somewhat tied to Rhule's "Top 57" comment - that there may be about 57 football players getting dollars while the remaining 20-25 athletes will be from volleyball and men's and women's basketball.  

 

[Toe]

I imagine they need to get the Title IX stuff figured out before they can commit to any particular division of dollars.

 

[Mavric]

[No message]