This is my first post, so hello everyone, and I'll save an introduction for another time.
Clearly there is no such thing as a "magic number" in college baseball, but there may be one statistically in the Big 10.
Since 2004 (an arbitrary number), no Big 10 team has been selected "at-large" with 37 wins or fewer. All teams that were selected at-large won 40+ (Minnesota 2007 [41], Ohio State 2009 [42], Michigan 2007 [42], Michigan 2005 [42], Minnesota 2009 [40]).
Similarly, those teams all had winning percentages .678 or greater (Minnesota 2007 [.695], Ohio State 2009 [.689], Michigan [.689], Michigan [.689], Minnesota [.678]). Purdue's 2011 and 2010 teams got snubbed with .649 and .642.
Whether the selection committee intended it or not, other factors such as conference standing and conference win % did not factor into the at large bids. For example, 2011 Michigan State and 2005 Illinois were snubbed despite number one finishes during conference play. 2005 Michigan made an at-large bid despite finishing fourth in conference play.
So if Nebraska has a "magic number" I would put it at 13 wins with a .675 winning percentage (one does not necessarily imply the other). With a stronger BIG 10, and clear front-runner in Purdue, one can certainly argue that number to be lower.
Of course, I would like Nebraska to win the Big 10's automatic bid, making any debate on this irrelevant.
So given this information (and any subsequent corrections), what are our chances?
Clearly there is no such thing as a "magic number" in college baseball, but there may be one statistically in the Big 10.
Since 2004 (an arbitrary number), no Big 10 team has been selected "at-large" with 37 wins or fewer. All teams that were selected at-large won 40+ (Minnesota 2007 [41], Ohio State 2009 [42], Michigan 2007 [42], Michigan 2005 [42], Minnesota 2009 [40]).
Similarly, those teams all had winning percentages .678 or greater (Minnesota 2007 [.695], Ohio State 2009 [.689], Michigan [.689], Michigan [.689], Minnesota [.678]). Purdue's 2011 and 2010 teams got snubbed with .649 and .642.
Whether the selection committee intended it or not, other factors such as conference standing and conference win % did not factor into the at large bids. For example, 2011 Michigan State and 2005 Illinois were snubbed despite number one finishes during conference play. 2005 Michigan made an at-large bid despite finishing fourth in conference play.
So if Nebraska has a "magic number" I would put it at 13 wins with a .675 winning percentage (one does not necessarily imply the other). With a stronger BIG 10, and clear front-runner in Purdue, one can certainly argue that number to be lower.
Of course, I would like Nebraska to win the Big 10's automatic bid, making any debate on this irrelevant.
So given this information (and any subsequent corrections), what are our chances?
Last edited by a moderator: