New Offensive Coordinator options?

While I truly hope this whole process works out and we can at least get to the point of .500 seasons, it more and more seems to me to be a move of desperation. I could see it turning into cluster%$@# rather easily.

 
Mavric said:
Part of the reason for the "delay" (which isn't really a delay but whatever) is that it's pretty bad form to interview assistant coaches until their season is over.  Thus, we couldn't interview some of the candidates until the last couple days.

Anae is in the mix.  Harrell and Whipple were two that we wanted to talk to but had to wait until this weekend.  Zak Hill on the list as well but seems headed to Auburn.  Whipple might not be looking to leave the Northeast.
Click to expand...


While you may not do "formal" interviews, informal conversations happen well before seasons end with head coaches and assistants. My read on the Journal Star article (if it's all accurate) is that some of the primary options did not work out and they are now working their way down a list.  Typically when a coach fires assistants before the season is over, he has an idea of who and what he wants as a replacement, and then steps are made to start working toward that. Either Frost fired his assistants without knowing who he wanted, or he knew who he wanted and it didn't work out.  Either way, it now looks like he is scrambling with some names that do not appear to be splash hires.  Let's hope the LJS article is wrong and there are some better names to come forward.  

 
admo said:
Yeah, I would have preferred to retain Lubick.  Continuity and give him full OC reigns.  BC we talking one more year.  Even the players on offense would have appreciated that.
Click to expand...
I would have been perfectly fine with that and replacing O line and RB coach and friggen, fix special teams. 
 

We don’t need a wholesale change on offense. The scheme works. We need better o line, RB and special teams. 

 
BigRedBuster said:
I would have been perfectly fine with that and replacing O line and RB coach and friggen, fix special teams. 
 

We don’t need a wholesale change on offense. The scheme works. We need better o line, RB and special teams. 
Click to expand...
Agreed.  Losing to Purdue was the 5th loss in 6 games, and bowling looked nearly impossible.  Something had to happen, I get that.  But Lubick seemed to get the blame for the Offense in this case.  And I still don't know why. 

 
BigRedBuster said:
I would have been perfectly fine with that and replacing O line and RB coach and friggen, fix special teams. 
 

We don’t need a wholesale change on offense. The scheme works. We need better o line, RB and special teams. 
Click to expand...


If Frost did not have a splash hire lined up that would have a great probability of making an immediate impact, I agree about keeping Lubick, giving him full OC play calling responsibility, and then replacing OL and RB coach. 

 
admo said:
Agreed.  Losing to Purdue was the 5th loss in 6 games, and bowling looked nearly impossible.  Something had to happen, I get that.  But Lubick seemed to get the blame for the Offense in this case.  And I still don't know why. 
Click to expand...


HuskerNation1 said:
If Frost did not have a splash hire lined up that would have a great probability of making an immediate impact, I agree about keeping Lubick, giving him full OC play calling responsibility, and then replacing OL and RB coach. 
Click to expand...
Which makes me think there was something else with Lubick like, he really didn’t enjoy being back in coaching. 
 

Now, if he goes out and gets another coaching gig, I’ll be proved wrong. 

 
admo said:
But Lubick seemed to get the blame for the Offense in this case.  And I still don't know why. 
Click to expand...
It’s called being made a scapegoat. For whatever reason(s) the guy who was actually responsible for the offense was retained. I mean obviously things were not good with the OL, RBs, WRs and QB room (ie the whole offense) but somebody had to get fired. I would guess Lubick had very little to do with any of it. Certainly less than the other 3 and way less than somebody who is still here.

 
JJ Husker said:
It’s called being made a scapegoat. For whatever reason(s) the guy who was actually responsible for the offense was retained. I mean obviously things were not good with the OL, RBs, WRs and QB room (ie the whole offense) but somebody had to get fired. I would guess Lubick had very little to do with any of it. Certainly less than the other 3 and way less than somebody who is still here.
Click to expand...
And yet, the offensive in general, wasn’t the problem in most of our losses. 

 
HuskerNation1 said:
While you may not do "formal" interviews, informal conversations happen well before seasons end with head coaches and assistants. My read on the Journal Star article (if it's all accurate) is that some of the primary options did not work out and they are now working their way down a list.  Typically when a coach fires assistants before the season is over, he has an idea of who and what he wants as a replacement, and then steps are made to start working toward that. Either Frost fired his assistants without knowing who he wanted, or he knew who he wanted and it didn't work out.  Either way, it now looks like he is scrambling with some names that do not appear to be splash hires.  Let's hope the LJS article is wrong and there are some better names to come forward.  
Click to expand...


I'm thinking he may be waiting til the dust settles from all the other coaching moves, hoping he can scoop up someone who has been left behind. I thought we learned a long time ago not to fire a coach until the replacement was 100% already lined up.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
BigRedBuster said:
And yet, the offensive in general, wasn’t the problem in most of our losses. 
Click to expand...
The offense worked pretty well until it got to the red zone or into any critical point of a game. Plenty of individual choke jobs that have to fall at the feet of the head coach, the real OC, the guy calling the plays and choosing the personnel. The team just mimicked him once anything went wrong. In so many ways the offense was fine……except whenever it really mattered. Even remedial kicking and special teams play would’ve helped win about 4 more. The thing this team needs maybe more than an OC, OL improvement and special teams is a sports psychologist. No fear of failure is just something that’s said, not actually exhibited.

All those one score losses and crazy s#!t that prevented winning, I really have my doubts if Frost will ever be worth a s#!t again. He has to be a flinching basket case and I think the team picked up on that.

 
HuskerNation1 said:
While you may not do "formal" interviews, informal conversations happen well before seasons end with head coaches and assistants. My read on the Journal Star article (if it's all accurate) is that some of the primary options did not work out and they are now working their way down a list.  Typically when a coach fires assistants before the season is over, he has an idea of who and what he wants as a replacement, and then steps are made to start working toward that. Either Frost fired his assistants without knowing who he wanted, or he knew who he wanted and it didn't work out.  Either way, it now looks like he is scrambling with some names that do not appear to be splash hires.  Let's hope the LJS article is wrong and there are some better names to come forward.  
Click to expand...


Head coaches ... yes.  Most of the big ones are all done through agents.

Assistants?  I don't think so.  They are not being hired through "informal conversations."  That's why there have been very few hired to this point.

 
Back
Top