Mierin
Donor
Don't know the details on the first. I'm not saying they shouldn't be held accountable obviously, and after enough years they get paid decently (if you ignore what is basically overtime hours for the majority), but for how much stock we put into the importance of education (and how important it actually is) they are not paid enough. Because they're paid so little, not as many smart people want to become teachers. Also, it's easy as pie to get an education degree. That's kind of a chicken/egg thing.OK.....so, everyone hated it. I'm not in education but I know enough people who hate it that it must have really sucked as a law. I agree with Knapp that it was a very well intended law that just didn't work out.
My biggest question now is, what will we see change in education due to getting rid of this law?
And, how do we hold teacher's accountable for doing their job well?
I know teachers in our own school that are fantastic and ones that totally suck. How do we quantify that so we can get rid of the ones that suck and reward the ones that are fantastic so our school system continues to improve?
Anyhow, incentivizing is how I think it should be done. If the teachers really do something bad then punish/fire them but I think the focus should be more on incentives for the really good ones.
Last edited by a moderator: