QMany
New member
FIFY---------OFFICIAL DAILY NUPolo8 COMPLAINS ABOUT BO THREAD--------------
FIFY---------OFFICIAL DAILY NUPolo8 COMPLAINS ABOUT BO THREAD--------------
Why are you still directing your anger at the guy who's been right all along?FIFY---------OFFICIAL DAILY NUPolo8 COMPLAINS ABOUT BO THREAD--------------
I am convinced you are a bigger. Bo fan than Nebraska fan at this point.FIFY---------OFFICIAL DAILY NUPolo8 COMPLAINS ABOUT BO THREAD--------------
From the time Wilson left his medical call until the time that the shooting was over and done with was 90 seconds. Did you listen to the results of the grand jury's decision at all tonight? As Wilson was telling them to step up onto the sidewalk and passing them he realized that Brown matched the description of the individual from the theft. That's when he stopped and the altercation escalated from there. You're pulling up stuff that's several months old and just not completely true and patchy at best.
Yeah and all of those 2000+ coaches has extra games as we do now in today's game and all coached at programs of the level of prestige that Pelini did. Use yourmotherf'ng brain NUance.Yeah, nice work Ladlord. That definitely puts Pelini in fifth place in the 9-wins per season category. That is, fifth among the 2,000+ head coaches of Div. 1 and FBS football over the past 100 years. lulzGetting a migraine but feeling affirmed after looking at Bo's column.5 (BTN Stats Guys say 6 but I can't find the sixth person) FBS Power-Five head coaches have had 9+ wins in their first seven years of coaching. They are as follows:
George Woodruff (Penn State - 1892-1898)
Tom Osborne (Nebraska - 1973-1979)
Barry Switzer (Oklahoma - 1973-1979)
Chris Petersen (Boise State - 2006-2012)
Bo Pelini (Nebraska - 2008-2014)
To disarm the stupid argument of all of your facebook friends, here are the comparisons of each of these head coaches in those 7 years that go deeper than wins.
George Woodruff coached in the 1890's before bowls and polls and conferences and etc., but he is credited with 3 national championships.
Tom Osborne
16-11 Against Ranked Teams
0 Top-5 Finishes
7 Top-10 Finishes
2 Conference Championships
5 Major Bowls (defined as Cotton, Fiesta, Sugar, Rose, Orange)
2 Major Bowl Wins
0 Undefeated Season
16 Losses
Barry Switzer
27-5 Against Ranked Teams
6 Top-5 Finishes
7 Top-10 Finishes
2 National Championships
7 Conference Championships
5 Major Bowls (for some reason they didn't play in bowl games his first two seasons, but these would have been major bowls as well)
4 Major Bowl Wins
2 Undefeated Seasons
7 Losses
Chris Petersen
7-5 Against Ranked Teams
2 Top-5 Finishes
4 Top-10 Finishes
5 Conference Championships
2 Major Bowls
2 Major Bowl Wins
2 Undefeated Seasons
8 Losses
Bo Pelini
9-17 Against Ranked Teams
0 Top-5 Finishes
0 Top-10 Finishes
0 Conference Championships
0 Major Bowls
0 Major Bowl Wins
0 Undefeated Seasons
27 Losses
Nice work Landlord.![]()
If it was that easy I guess hundreds of coaches have done it. Oh wait, my deficient brain is telling me that only five have.Yeah and all of those 2000+ coaches has extra games as we do now in today's game and all coached at programs of the level of prestige that Pelini did. Use yourmotherf'ng brain NUance.Yeah, nice work Ladlord. That definitely puts Pelini in fifth place in the 9-wins per season category. That is, fifth among the 2,000+ head coaches of Div. 1 and FBS football over the past 100 years. lulzGetting a migraine but feeling affirmed after looking at Bo's column.5 (BTN Stats Guys say 6 but I can't find the sixth person) FBS Power-Five head coaches have had 9+ wins in their first seven years of coaching. They are as follows:
George Woodruff (Penn State - 1892-1898)
Tom Osborne (Nebraska - 1973-1979)
Barry Switzer (Oklahoma - 1973-1979)
Chris Petersen (Boise State - 2006-2012)
Bo Pelini (Nebraska - 2008-2014)
To disarm the stupid argument of all of your facebook friends, here are the comparisons of each of these head coaches in those 7 years that go deeper than wins.
George Woodruff coached in the 1890's before bowls and polls and conferences and etc., but he is credited with 3 national championships.
Tom Osborne
16-11 Against Ranked Teams
0 Top-5 Finishes
7 Top-10 Finishes
2 Conference Championships
5 Major Bowls (defined as Cotton, Fiesta, Sugar, Rose, Orange)
2 Major Bowl Wins
0 Undefeated Season
16 Losses
Barry Switzer
27-5 Against Ranked Teams
6 Top-5 Finishes
7 Top-10 Finishes
2 National Championships
7 Conference Championships
5 Major Bowls (for some reason they didn't play in bowl games his first two seasons, but these would have been major bowls as well)
4 Major Bowl Wins
2 Undefeated Seasons
7 Losses
Chris Petersen
7-5 Against Ranked Teams
2 Top-5 Finishes
4 Top-10 Finishes
5 Conference Championships
2 Major Bowls
2 Major Bowl Wins
2 Undefeated Seasons
8 Losses
Bo Pelini
9-17 Against Ranked Teams
0 Top-5 Finishes
0 Top-10 Finishes
0 Conference Championships
0 Major Bowls
0 Major Bowl Wins
0 Undefeated Seasons
27 Losses
Nice work Landlord.![]()
Yeah and all of those 2000+ coaches has extra games as we do now in today's game and all coached at programs of the level of prestige that Pelini did. Use yourmotherf'ng brain NUance.Yeah, nice work Ladlord. That definitely puts Pelini in fifth place in the 9-wins per season category. That is, fifth among the 2,000+ head coaches of Div. 1 and FBS football over the past 100 years. lulzGetting a migraine but feeling affirmed after looking at Bo's column.5 (BTN Stats Guys say 6 but I can't find the sixth person) FBS Power-Five head coaches have had 9+ wins in their first seven years of coaching. They are as follows:
George Woodruff (Penn State - 1892-1898)
Tom Osborne (Nebraska - 1973-1979)
Barry Switzer (Oklahoma - 1973-1979)
Chris Petersen (Boise State - 2006-2012)
Bo Pelini (Nebraska - 2008-2014)
To disarm the stupid argument of all of your facebook friends, here are the comparisons of each of these head coaches in those 7 years that go deeper than wins.
George Woodruff coached in the 1890's before bowls and polls and conferences and etc., but he is credited with 3 national championships.
Tom Osborne
16-11 Against Ranked Teams
0 Top-5 Finishes
7 Top-10 Finishes
2 Conference Championships
5 Major Bowls (defined as Cotton, Fiesta, Sugar, Rose, Orange)
2 Major Bowl Wins
0 Undefeated Season
16 Losses
Barry Switzer
27-5 Against Ranked Teams
6 Top-5 Finishes
7 Top-10 Finishes
2 National Championships
7 Conference Championships
5 Major Bowls (for some reason they didn't play in bowl games his first two seasons, but these would have been major bowls as well)
4 Major Bowl Wins
2 Undefeated Seasons
7 Losses
Chris Petersen
7-5 Against Ranked Teams
2 Top-5 Finishes
4 Top-10 Finishes
5 Conference Championships
2 Major Bowls
2 Major Bowl Wins
2 Undefeated Seasons
8 Losses
Bo Pelini
9-17 Against Ranked Teams
0 Top-5 Finishes
0 Top-10 Finishes
0 Conference Championships
0 Major Bowls
0 Major Bowl Wins
0 Undefeated Seasons
27 Losses
Nice work Landlord.![]()
@bean:If it was that easy I guess hundreds of coaches have done it. Oh wait, my deficient brain is telling me that only five have.Yeah and all of those 2000+ coaches has extra games as we do now in today's game and all coached at programs of the level of prestige that Pelini did. Use yourmotherf'ng brain NUance.Yeah, nice work Ladlord. That definitely puts Pelini in fifth place in the 9-wins per season category. That is, fifth among the 2,000+ head coaches of Div. 1 and FBS football over the past 100 years. lulzGetting a migraine but feeling affirmed after looking at Bo's column.Nice work Landlord.5 (BTN Stats Guys say 6 but I can't find the sixth person) FBS Power-Five head coaches have had 9+ wins in their first seven years of coaching. They are as follows:
George Woodruff (Penn State - 1892-1898)
Tom Osborne (Nebraska - 1973-1979)
Barry Switzer (Oklahoma - 1973-1979)
Chris Petersen (Boise State - 2006-2012)
Bo Pelini (Nebraska - 2008-2014)
To disarm the stupid argument of all of your facebook friends, here are the comparisons of each of these head coaches in those 7 years that go deeper than wins.
George Woodruff coached in the 1890's before bowls and polls and conferences and etc., but he is credited with 3 national championships.
Tom Osborne
16-11 Against Ranked Teams
0 Top-5 Finishes
7 Top-10 Finishes
2 Conference Championships
5 Major Bowls (defined as Cotton, Fiesta, Sugar, Rose, Orange)
2 Major Bowl Wins
0 Undefeated Season
16 Losses
Barry Switzer
27-5 Against Ranked Teams
6 Top-5 Finishes
7 Top-10 Finishes
2 National Championships
7 Conference Championships
5 Major Bowls (for some reason they didn't play in bowl games his first two seasons, but these would have been major bowls as well)
4 Major Bowl Wins
2 Undefeated Seasons
7 Losses
Chris Petersen
7-5 Against Ranked Teams
2 Top-5 Finishes
4 Top-10 Finishes
5 Conference Championships
2 Major Bowls
2 Major Bowl Wins
2 Undefeated Seasons
8 Losses
Bo Pelini
9-17 Against Ranked Teams
0 Top-5 Finishes
0 Top-10 Finishes
0 Conference Championships
0 Major Bowls
0 Major Bowl Wins
0 Undefeated Seasons
27 Losses![]()
Sure, I'd rather see us win 12 or 13 games. Who wouldn't? But why tackle this 9-win argument in the first place? If only five coaches in the history of Div. 1 and FBS have done it, then why even go there? Riddle me that Mr. Big Brain.![]()
And yet he will most likely be the coach of Nebraska next year. Despite your boring rant.Sure, Bo's a good coach. He gets his nine wins a season and goes and wins the taxslayer.com gator bowl every now and then. But guess what, we don't care about the taxslayer.com gator bowl. We want to play for that nice and shiny National Championship trophy. We should be blowing out Minnesota, not giving up 400 some yard to Wisconsin, not winning in Overtime against Iowa, and not squeaking by McNeese. We should be dominating those teams, the kind of blowing them out 60-zip and were not even done with the first half domination (okay maybe I'm kidding...maybe). We want to see our defense completely dominate, playing physical, up in your face football. We want to be the team that everyone hates except out fans, the team that QB's fear more than anything in the world (other then that creepy Purdue mascot). We want to be in the top 5 every year, we want to play in the national championship game every year. Maybe Bo's a good coach for Colorado, or Illinois, but he's not a good coach for Nebraska.
Get off the board. You know what you are going to read. Why waste the time if you don't share the opinion of the collective.And yet he will most likely be the coach of Nebraska next year. Despite your boring rant.Sure, Bo's a good coach. He gets his nine wins a season and goes and wins the taxslayer.com gator bowl every now and then. But guess what, we don't care about the taxslayer.com gator bowl. We want to play for that nice and shiny National Championship trophy. We should be blowing out Minnesota, not giving up 400 some yard to Wisconsin, not winning in Overtime against Iowa, and not squeaking by McNeese. We should be dominating those teams, the kind of blowing them out 60-zip and were not even done with the first half domination (okay maybe I'm kidding...maybe). We want to see our defense completely dominate, playing physical, up in your face football. We want to be the team that everyone hates except out fans, the team that QB's fear more than anything in the world (other then that creepy Purdue mascot). We want to be in the top 5 every year, we want to play in the national championship game every year. Maybe Bo's a good coach for Colorado, or Illinois, but he's not a good coach for Nebraska.
You get off the board, so I don't have to read your drivel.Get off the board. You know what you are going to read. Why waste the time if you don't share the opinion of the collective.And yet he will most likely be the coach of Nebraska next year. Despite your boring rant.Sure, Bo's a good coach. He gets his nine wins a season and goes and wins the taxslayer.com gator bowl every now and then. But guess what, we don't care about the taxslayer.com gator bowl. We want to play for that nice and shiny National Championship trophy. We should be blowing out Minnesota, not giving up 400 some yard to Wisconsin, not winning in Overtime against Iowa, and not squeaking by McNeese. We should be dominating those teams, the kind of blowing them out 60-zip and were not even done with the first half domination (okay maybe I'm kidding...maybe). We want to see our defense completely dominate, playing physical, up in your face football. We want to be the team that everyone hates except out fans, the team that QB's fear more than anything in the world (other then that creepy Purdue mascot). We want to be in the top 5 every year, we want to play in the national championship game every year. Maybe Bo's a good coach for Colorado, or Illinois, but he's not a good coach for Nebraska.
quality discourse here.You get off the board, so I don't have to read your drivel.Get off the board. You know what you are going to read. Why waste the time if you don't share the opinion of the collective.And yet he will most likely be the coach of Nebraska next year. Despite your boring rant.Sure, Bo's a good coach. He gets his nine wins a season and goes and wins the taxslayer.com gator bowl every now and then. But guess what, we don't care about the taxslayer.com gator bowl. We want to play for that nice and shiny National Championship trophy. We should be blowing out Minnesota, not giving up 400 some yard to Wisconsin, not winning in Overtime against Iowa, and not squeaking by McNeese. We should be dominating those teams, the kind of blowing them out 60-zip and were not even done with the first half domination (okay maybe I'm kidding...maybe). We want to see our defense completely dominate, playing physical, up in your face football. We want to be the team that everyone hates except out fans, the team that QB's fear more than anything in the world (other then that creepy Purdue mascot). We want to be in the top 5 every year, we want to play in the national championship game every year. Maybe Bo's a good coach for Colorado, or Illinois, but he's not a good coach for Nebraska.