Offending Posts Thread

[NUpolo8]

He's only not highly regarded by those afflicted with acute butthurt.

I guess growing weary after seven years and refusing to give a guy even one is the same to you. Interesting.

 

[walksalone]

We all know Eichorst wanted Polo but they couldn't agree to a bold flavor compromise.

I come with quite the demand list, kimosabe.

 

[NUpolo8]

We all know Eichorst wanted Polo but they couldn't agree to a bold flavor compromise.

I come with quite the demand list, kimosabe.

You're mad at your general situaish, not at me. I get it, kimosabe. I'm here for a guy to guy anytime.

 

[walksalone]

You're mad at your general situaish, not at me. I get it, kimosabe. I'm here for a guy to guy anytime.

I would but I'm not able to communicate in enough one syllable words for you to comprehend...

 

[NUpolo8]

You're mad at your general situaish, not at me. I get it, kimosabe. I'm here for a guy to guy anytime.

I would but I'm not able to communicate in enough one syllable words for you to comprehend...

I'm sure that's the issue.

 

[NUpolo8]

Not sure why everyone seems to think Meyer is the best coach in the country?

My uncle joe with a bum leg could coach all that talent to 10+ wins.

That is what I have been saying about Riley at NU...
But I have been told more than a few times that Riley getting 7 wins next season would be good.

Meyer is a stud...he clearly had his choice of almost anyone he wanted for this spot and he picked Beck, which says a lot, it might not mean he will be great at OSU but it clearly says a lot that he is the one that was picked.

You've been told that by your fellow pearl clutchers.

 

[True2tRA]

Not sure why everyone seems to think Meyer is the best coach in the country?

My uncle joe with a bum leg could coach all that talent to 10+ wins.

That is what I have been saying about Riley at NU...
But I have been told more than a few times that Riley getting 7 wins next season would be good.

Meyer is a stud...he clearly had his choice of almost anyone he wanted for this spot and he picked Beck, which says a lot, it might not mean he will be great at OSU but it clearly says a lot that he is the one that was picked.

You've been told that by your fellow pearl clutchers.

 

[Sebastian the Ibis]

who cares?

 

[SWAMI]

Exactly, Redux. I'll fully admit to being wrong about the 4 team playoff versus the old system(s). However, a good number of the games that were considered "so exciting to be played" would take on much less importance than they do now. That is one of the main reasons I couldn't care less about who wins a particular NFL game until perhaps the last couple of weeks.

Also, I highly doubt we don't get a deserving national champion with 4 teams. Yes, TCU probably got the shaft at the hands of FSU this year, but at the same time, it doesn't mean TCU got screwed out of a national title. I'll never advocate a ranking system as a way to determine best teams, however I'm not concerned with the voted #6 team not getting a playoff spot.

Did you hear Steven A. Smith this morning bragging about how he backed Ohio St. leapfrogging TCU? That type of thinking is part and parcel to the problem of the old system. The fact is we'll never know if Ohio St. could beat TCU. The new format is far better than yesteryear's, but it's still not optimal; and, quite frankly, never will be regardless of the number of teams invited. I'm not a TCU fan, but it sickens me to think we have a system which allowed for a team to be moved up 2 spots to 3rd then win by 50 and get dropped back to 5th because OSU walloped Wisconsin. That's just wrong. I understand what the ramifications are, but based off of what took place Ohio St. should have been odd man out or, better yet, if you leapfrog Florida St. then you should have stayed atop them. The committee didn't think through the 'What ifs" prior to that last week. I also believe there was a racial component considered.

It bothers me when people complain about TCU dropping to #5 the final week even after beating a team by 50 points. TCU was #4 the week before the championship games because they had (what the committee considered to be) the 4th best resume at that point. They had already played their best opponents and thus benefited from those quality wins and losses. When Ohio State drubbed a top 15/20 team 59-0 and TCU beat ISU handily, both teams updated their resumes, but clearly OSU's win counted for a lot more than TCU's. It just happened, mostly as a result of the Big 12's lack of conference championship, that OSU played one of their best opponents the last week and TCU played one of their worst. Maybe TCU was the 4th best team before that last week, but it makes perfect sense after re-evaluating each team's complete resume, to make OSU #4 in the final rankings, even ignoring their success in the playoffs.

Also, there was a racial component considered?? You cannot be serious.

Re: the racial element. Maybe that is a stretch, but think about it for a second, then don't waste anymore time. You have in Florida St. an undefeated defending national champ with a QB who can't stay out of trouble at a time when our President has us more divided than any time in the last 50 years. They get snubbed and the Al Sharptens of the world would ignore it? Like I said, don't waste too much time on that part of the argument. Time for The Swam to hit the sack. Imagination is a tad bit blurry. Night gentlemen.

 

[Mierin]

Re: the racial element. Maybe that is a stretch, but think about it for a second, then don't waste anymore time. You have in Florida St. an undefeated defending national champ with a QB who can't stay out of trouble at a time when our President has us more divided than any time in the last 50 years. They get snubbed and the Al Sharptens of the world would ignore it?

This is one of the most moronic posts I've ever seen on huskerboard.

 

[walksalone]

Re: the racial element. Maybe that is a stretch, but think about it for a second, then don't waste anymore time. You have in Florida St. an undefeated defending national champ with a QB who can't stay out of trouble at a time when our President has us more divided than any time in the last 50 years. They get snubbed and the Al Sharptens of the world would ignore it?

This is one of the most moronic posts I've ever seen on huskerboard.

Well, at least the jackassery is consistent...

 

[Ratt Mhule]

Re: the racial element. Maybe that is a stretch, but think about it for a second, then don't waste anymore time. You have in Florida St. an undefeated defending national champ with a QB who can't stay out of trouble at a time when our President has us more divided than any time in the last 50 years. They get snubbed and the Al Sharptens of the world would ignore it? Like I said, don't waste too much time on that part of the argument. Time for The Swam to hit the sack. Imagination is a tad bit blurry. Night gentlemen.

 

[DrinkinwitTerrellFarley]

Re: the racial element. Maybe that is a stretch, but think about it for a second, then don't waste anymore time. You have in Florida St. an undefeated defending national champ with a QB who can't stay out of trouble at a time when our President has us more divided than any time in the last 50 years. They get snubbed and the Al Sharptens of the world would ignore it?

This is one of the most moronic posts I've ever seen on huskerboard.

I agree, and it has nothing to do with the President. It does have to do with Al Sharpton but also other lying gasbags like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity. Anyway enough politics, there is no racial element whatsoever to FSU's playoff inclusion. It had to do with a P5 conference champion being undefeated and the defending champion from last year. Nothing more.

 

[NUpolo8]

Going to Youngstown St. According to Vincent Valentine.

a lot of the law is a matter of semantics. what do you think is being argued in so many appellate cases?

Thank you for beating me to this point.

Your point was to accuse him of a crime he clearly didn't commit. This isn't an ambiguity between two laws, it is a pretty clear interpretation. That didn't stop you from throwing claims that he committed "sexual assault" without even knowing what the hell it meant.

At least this isn't a deflection.

It's an assault in a great many states.

And I'm pretty stunned you'd want him back, after two transgressions. Maybe Youngstown st will take him.

Which states? Your infatuation with Bo Pelini and YSU is troubling.?

Whoops.

 

[LumberJackSker]

The fact that this issue has to be debated is pathetic. Just because your faith says doesn't like a group of people doesn't mean you get to discriminate against them through laws. Because of deuteronomy 15:12-15 does that give us the right to own slaves? Nope. So just because you think gay people are gross doesn't mean you can with hold rights from them. That is wrong, end of story.

Thanks for the conversation guys and gals. I was done posting in this thread until I saw this. This has got to be one of the dumbest things I've ever read. I think reading it, may have actually made me dumber. Which I sure some of you didn't think was possible. No where in this conversation did I quote my faith, scripture or say that gay people were gross.
With that, may God bless you all. And for those who don't like that, may the great flying spaghetti monster rain meatballs upon you and your family.

who said I was responding to you? Didn't know you owned this thread my bad. I assumed I had the right to just share my opinion on what the supreme court was up to. Again you have my deepest apologies how dare I comment in a thread that you did. I think you were probably pretty f'ing stupid before you read this if you assume a comment in a thread were I don't even quote you is automatically about you. I don't even know you or what your beliefs are. But again I'm deeply sorry if I in any way by not mentioning you attacked you in any way.