Offending Posts Thread

[teachercd]

By the way...I think Pett might be the only person that could foul out of a prison game

Some of the Sh#t you say is so damn stupid sometimes.

Only sometimes???

 

[Blackshirts007]

Webster you piece of sh#t. I think he has 4 or 5 turnovers today. Dude is so bad. Would have been a 1 point game if anyone else was there to turn around and make a layup, and not dribble it off their damn foot.

 

[True2tRA]

Wow...that is glaring.

Miles needs to put his big boy pants on

You need to give it a rest NuPoloJr.

 

[Riledup]

Dont like

 

[StPaulHusker]

Blitzfirst=Huskerboard martyr

 

[MasterPulverizer]

Good question

Ive never run/coached the true pro style offense as defined by guys who have coached it in real life.

However I do understand it quite well. I was more or less tutored by one of the top guys nationally that run it/teach it.

If I did run it, I would run what most experts call the "East Coast" less popular flavor- Gibbs approach with Zone, Power and Counter Trey along with all the traditional pro pass concepts from UC. Of course it would depend on what I had for talent. Im not a square peg into round hole guy.

If I was coaching College ball I would fall in the Malzahn camp, Wing T principles out of Shotgun many times Spread- the guy is a genius. Simplicity, putting defenses into conflict, series based football- handful of plays with adjustments, maximizing the equation. He plays defenses against themselves, great playcaller, great scheme.

I also like Urban Meyer, a Single Wing coach per his book "Urbans Way" who adapts to his talent base. He changes a bit every year based on what he has for talent. Excels at doing the ordinary extraordinarily well. Amazing coach- watch what he can do this year without worrying about QB injuries, (something that DRAMATICALLY changed what Becks offense looked like) Meyers offense this year will look a lot like what he ran earlier- at OSU or at Bowling Green, will be fun to watch.

The goal is to win the game, end of story. You have an approach/philosophy and adapt those concepts- what you know and what you and your coaching staff CAN coach - to the equation you are given. Adapt to what your players CAN do and who you play- what your conference, opponents can consistently do.

Guys like Meyer and Malzahn do that and consistently win, no matter where they are at, they are the elite in coaching today. How they teach and how they practice is even more important than their scheme.

Personally Ive Coached the Veer, Osborne Flavor I, Spread, Double Wing, Wing T concepts and lots of Spread Jet stuff. Happy to talk real xs and os with anyone honest/open minded.

I call BS. You sound like a video game nerd that's watched a lot of 'tape' of different coaches and spew this nonsense like you know it first hand. When you say "happy to talk read xs and os" it just gives you an opportunity to discredit any opinion because they're not a real coach. Any coach that has "evolved" as much as you have under all of those different offenses sounds like someone who chases the flavor of the month, and probably lacks true identity, which probably isn't a very good coach.

 

[Guy Chamberlin]

Good question

Ive never run/coached the true pro style offense as defined by guys who have coached it in real life.

However I do understand it quite well. I was more or less tutored by one of the top guys nationally that run it/teach it.

If I did run it, I would run what most experts call the "East Coast" less popular flavor- Gibbs approach with Zone, Power and Counter Trey along with all the traditional pro pass concepts from UC. Of course it would depend on what I had for talent. Im not a square peg into round hole guy.

If I was coaching College ball I would fall in the Malzahn camp, Wing T principles out of Shotgun many times Spread- the guy is a genius. Simplicity, putting defenses into conflict, series based football- handful of plays with adjustments, maximizing the equation. He plays defenses against themselves, great playcaller, great scheme.

I also like Urban Meyer, a Single Wing coach per his book "Urbans Way" who adapts to his talent base. He changes a bit every year based on what he has for talent. Excels at doing the ordinary extraordinarily well. Amazing coach- watch what he can do this year without worrying about QB injuries, (something that DRAMATICALLY changed what Becks offense looked like) Meyers offense this year will look a lot like what he ran earlier- at OSU or at Bowling Green, will be fun to watch.

The goal is to win the game, end of story. You have an approach/philosophy and adapt those concepts- what you know and what you and your coaching staff CAN coach - to the equation you are given. Adapt to what your players CAN do and who you play- what your conference, opponents can consistently do.

Guys like Meyer and Malzahn do that and consistently win, no matter where they are at, they are the elite in coaching today. How they teach and how they practice is even more important than their scheme.

Personally Ive Coached the Veer, Osborne Flavor I, Spread, Double Wing, Wing T concepts and lots of Spread Jet stuff. Happy to talk real xs and os with anyone honest/open minded.

I call BS. You sound like a video game nerd that's watched a lot of 'tape' of different coaches and spew this nonsense like you know it first hand. When you say "happy to talk read xs and os" it just gives you an opportunity to discredit any opinion because they're not a real coach. Any coach that has "evolved" as much as you have under all of those different offenses sounds like someone who chases the flavor of the month, and probably lacks true identity, which probably isn't a very good coach.

And you sound like a poster on a Nebraska football fansite, who uses words like "identity" and "flavor of the month" to criticize anyone who doesn't think Nebraska should just run the ball like they used to when they won National Championships.

Careful with the nerd talk, Pulverizer.

 

[MasterPulverizer]

Good question

Ive never run/coached the true pro style offense as defined by guys who have coached it in real life.

However I do understand it quite well. I was more or less tutored by one of the top guys nationally that run it/teach it.

If I did run it, I would run what most experts call the "East Coast" less popular flavor- Gibbs approach with Zone, Power and Counter Trey along with all the traditional pro pass concepts from UC. Of course it would depend on what I had for talent. Im not a square peg into round hole guy.

If I was coaching College ball I would fall in the Malzahn camp, Wing T principles out of Shotgun many times Spread- the guy is a genius. Simplicity, putting defenses into conflict, series based football- handful of plays with adjustments, maximizing the equation. He plays defenses against themselves, great playcaller, great scheme.

I also like Urban Meyer, a Single Wing coach per his book "Urbans Way" who adapts to his talent base. He changes a bit every year based on what he has for talent. Excels at doing the ordinary extraordinarily well. Amazing coach- watch what he can do this year without worrying about QB injuries, (something that DRAMATICALLY changed what Becks offense looked like) Meyers offense this year will look a lot like what he ran earlier- at OSU or at Bowling Green, will be fun to watch.

The goal is to win the game, end of story. You have an approach/philosophy and adapt those concepts- what you know and what you and your coaching staff CAN coach - to the equation you are given. Adapt to what your players CAN do and who you play- what your conference, opponents can consistently do.

Guys like Meyer and Malzahn do that and consistently win, no matter where they are at, they are the elite in coaching today. How they teach and how they practice is even more important than their scheme.

Personally Ive Coached the Veer, Osborne Flavor I, Spread, Double Wing, Wing T concepts and lots of Spread Jet stuff. Happy to talk real xs and os with anyone honest/open minded.

I call BS. You sound like a video game nerd that's watched a lot of 'tape' of different coaches and spew this nonsense like you know it first hand. When you say "happy to talk read xs and os" it just gives you an opportunity to discredit any opinion because they're not a real coach. Any coach that has "evolved" as much as you have under all of those different offenses sounds like someone who chases the flavor of the month, and probably lacks true identity, which probably isn't a very good coach.

And you sound like a poster on a Nebraska football fansite, who uses words like "identity" and "flavor of the month" to criticize anyone who doesn't think Nebraska should just run the ball like they used to when they won National Championships.

Careful with the nerd talk, Pulverizer.

Ironic considering you have like 2700 posts where I have 135.

I didn't say anything about Nebraska. I don't care what the offense or defense looks like as long as they're winning and playing well. I just take issue with the "knowledge" this guy is espousing and as a poster on a football fan site, I have the right and obligation to judge criticize anomalously.

 

[Guy Chamberlin]

Yes. We both have the right to make the observations we did.

Still, you might want study up on the meaning of "ironic" and the spelling of "anonymously" before taking someone to task for his "knowledge."

 

[darkhorse85]

Good question

Ive never run/coached the true pro style offense as defined by guys who have coached it in real life.

However I do understand it quite well. I was more or less tutored by one of the top guys nationally that run it/teach it.

If I did run it, I would run what most experts call the "East Coast" less popular flavor- Gibbs approach with Zone, Power and Counter Trey along with all the traditional pro pass concepts from UC. Of course it would depend on what I had for talent. Im not a square peg into round hole guy.

If I was coaching College ball I would fall in the Malzahn camp, Wing T principles out of Shotgun many times Spread- the guy is a genius. Simplicity, putting defenses into conflict, series based football- handful of plays with adjustments, maximizing the equation. He plays defenses against themselves, great playcaller, great scheme.

I also like Urban Meyer, a Single Wing coach per his book "Urbans Way" who adapts to his talent base. He changes a bit every year based on what he has for talent. Excels at doing the ordinary extraordinarily well. Amazing coach- watch what he can do this year without worrying about QB injuries, (something that DRAMATICALLY changed what Becks offense looked like) Meyers offense this year will look a lot like what he ran earlier- at OSU or at Bowling Green, will be fun to watch.

The goal is to win the game, end of story. You have an approach/philosophy and adapt those concepts- what you know and what you and your coaching staff CAN coach - to the equation you are given. Adapt to what your players CAN do and who you play- what your conference, opponents can consistently do.

Guys like Meyer and Malzahn do that and consistently win, no matter where they are at, they are the elite in coaching today. How they teach and how they practice is even more important than their scheme.

Personally Ive Coached the Veer, Osborne Flavor I, Spread, Double Wing, Wing T concepts and lots of Spread Jet stuff. Happy to talk real xs and os with anyone honest/open minded.

I call BS. You sound like a video game nerd that's watched a lot of 'tape' of different coaches and spew this nonsense like you know it first hand. When you say "happy to talk read xs and os" it just gives you an opportunity to discredit any opinion because they're not a real coach. Any coach that has "evolved" as much as you have under all of those different offenses sounds like someone who chases the flavor of the month, and probably lacks true identity, which probably isn't a very good coach.

And you sound like a poster on a Nebraska football fansite, who uses words like "identity" and "flavor of the month" to criticize anyone who doesn't think Nebraska should just run the ball like they used to when they won National Championships.

Careful with the nerd talk, Pulverizer.

Ironic considering you have like 2700 posts where I have 135.

I didn't say anything about Nebraska. I don't care what the offense or defense looks like as long as they're winning and playing well. I just take issue with the "knowledge" this guy is espousing and as a poster on a football fan site, I have the right and obligation to judge criticize anomalously.

You sound like some people I know.

 

[MasterPulverizer]

Good question

Ive never run/coached the true pro style offense as defined by guys who have coached it in real life.

However I do understand it quite well. I was more or less tutored by one of the top guys nationally that run it/teach it.

If I did run it, I would run what most experts call the "East Coast" less popular flavor- Gibbs approach with Zone, Power and Counter Trey along with all the traditional pro pass concepts from UC. Of course it would depend on what I had for talent. Im not a square peg into round hole guy.

If I was coaching College ball I would fall in the Malzahn camp, Wing T principles out of Shotgun many times Spread- the guy is a genius. Simplicity, putting defenses into conflict, series based football- handful of plays with adjustments, maximizing the equation. He plays defenses against themselves, great playcaller, great scheme.

I also like Urban Meyer, a Single Wing coach per his book "Urbans Way" who adapts to his talent base. He changes a bit every year based on what he has for talent. Excels at doing the ordinary extraordinarily well. Amazing coach- watch what he can do this year without worrying about QB injuries, (something that DRAMATICALLY changed what Becks offense looked like) Meyers offense this year will look a lot like what he ran earlier- at OSU or at Bowling Green, will be fun to watch.

The goal is to win the game, end of story. You have an approach/philosophy and adapt those concepts- what you know and what you and your coaching staff CAN coach - to the equation you are given. Adapt to what your players CAN do and who you play- what your conference, opponents can consistently do.

Guys like Meyer and Malzahn do that and consistently win, no matter where they are at, they are the elite in coaching today. How they teach and how they practice is even more important than their scheme.

Personally Ive Coached the Veer, Osborne Flavor I, Spread, Double Wing, Wing T concepts and lots of Spread Jet stuff. Happy to talk real xs and os with anyone honest/open minded.

I call BS. You sound like a video game nerd that's watched a lot of 'tape' of different coaches and spew this nonsense like you know it first hand. When you say "happy to talk read xs and os" it just gives you an opportunity to discredit any opinion because they're not a real coach. Any coach that has "evolved" as much as you have under all of those different offenses sounds like someone who chases the flavor of the month, and probably lacks true identity, which probably isn't a very good coach.

And you sound like a poster on a Nebraska football fansite, who uses words like "identity" and "flavor of the month" to criticize anyone who doesn't think Nebraska should just run the ball like they used to when they won National Championships.

Careful with the nerd talk, Pulverizer.

Ironic considering you have like 2700 posts where I have 135.

I didn't say anything about Nebraska. I don't care what the offense or defense looks like as long as they're winning and playing well. I just take issue with the "knowledge" this guy is espousing and as a poster on a football fan site, I have the right and obligation to judge criticize anomalously.

You sound like some people I know.

Hahaha those are your friends?

 

[Scratchtown]

They forgot #6....Jack Gangwish

Sorry I couldn't resist.

I'll bite.

That's the dumbest thing I've read. Clearly you aren't joking. You've made it very clear of your childish hate for the hardest working player on the team. Period.

It's getting old. Just stop.

 

[teachercd]

They forgot #6....Jack Gangwish

Sorry I couldn't resist.

I'll bite.

That's the dumbest thing I've read. Clearly you aren't joking. You've made it very clear of your childish hate for the hardest working player on the team. Period.

It's getting old. Just stop.

How is he the hardest working kid on the team?

You better hope he has a monster year with your crazy love for him.

 

[cornographic]

Until Gregory is accused of choking a woman or running drugs...let’s ease up on the “character” accusations

Seriously, if he wanted to choke people or run drugs, he'd become a cop... Jeez!

 

[caveman99]

I couldn't even find this guy on Rivals official site, but jeez, I sure do hope we can pull him away from KU, TX St, or CSU

. This could be Riley's 2nd 2* RB to date, if he signs that is. Ok, well, I guess Ozigbo got the NU bump to 3* since he signed, but he was 2* before that with a plethora of offers from 2nd tier schools. Both RBs come in at a 'blazing' 4.7-ish in the 40, woohooo!

We're kinda used to high 3* or 4*(Castille, Helu, Burkhead, Ameer, T Newby, A Taylor, M Wilbon) or the occasional 5*(Aaron Green) 'round here @ 'RB U', Riley knows that, right?

Is it just me, or is Riley taking his reputation as a developer of 'project players' a bit too seriously?

2 star only means that he has not been evaluated. More often, these kids get recruited by a bigger school and get bumped to a 3. I think Callahan & Bo recruited based on the stars, where Riley looks for talent that will fit his system. Moreover, Riley needs to prove he can win before these higher star players commit. Most of these kids were not even born when the Huskers were really good.

If 4.7 40s 'fit his system', I'm worried. Lack of evaluation kind of worries me too.
Maybe the 'resource' thing hasn't quite set into to Riley's mindset yet.

Really!! An average 40 for high school kids is 4.7. We do not know if this elec. or manual, as manual times are far from correct. These kids can and most likely will get faster. He might be at 4.6 or 4.5 by the time he goes to college. There is a lot more than just speed in a good running back: vision, agility, power, blocking & receiving for a few. I agree this kid does not look good on paper, but I trust this coaching staff. Has Riley shown he is not capable of recruiting at NE?

4.7 is slow for an RB, especially for one who weighs only 190 lbs. So, if I am A Thomas, I wouldn't put that on my resume if it's not his true speed. If it is, well, it's slow.
I guess we don't have much of a sample size of Riley's recruiting @ NU. Most of what I'm seeing so far is fairly underwhelming w alot of 'spin' from fans, so I should probably just stay away from the subject until something 'wows' me.

He did score that 4* DT out of Okie, so I'll give him that much.

Rex and ameer after finishing college ran in the 4.6 range. A legit 4.71 which was electronicly timed is fast enough as a junior in high school. Kids tape is pretty solid. Riley has landed a 4 star OT from Oklahoma but not a DT.

Cornographic sounds like a 15yo with nothing better to do