Offending Posts Thread

[Scratchtown]

I mean, we're not talking about people being raucous or inappropriate in private conversation. We're talking about people looking at Native Americans as 'prairie n***ers'.*

Everyone does that? We shouldn't have a problem with that view?

(* - the 'to-be-fair' caveat being we don't know if that accurately describes this woman)

The fact that somebody's first reaction is basically "everyone is like this" is perplexing and a little disheartening. My first thought was "God bless him, his parents were idiots".

FvcK You dude.

You completely don't understand the context. You POS.

So you can't call out a poster on this board but you can say that garbage about a poster's parents.

Even AFTER I described the context in a later post, you STILL came up with that. You are a sorry excuse for a human being.

 

[The Dude]

I mean, we're not talking about people being raucous or inappropriate in private conversation. We're talking about people looking at Native Americans as 'prairie n***ers'.*

Everyone does that? We shouldn't have a problem with that view?

(* - the 'to-be-fair' caveat being we don't know if that accurately describes this woman)

The fact that somebody's first reaction is basically "everyone is like this" is perplexing and a little disheartening. My first thought was "God bless him, his parents were idiots".

FvcK You dude.

You completely don't understand the context. You POS.

So you can't call out a poster on this board but you can say that garbage about a poster's parents.

Even AFTER I described the context in a later post, you STILL came up with that. You are a sorry excuse for a human being.

I suppose it wouldn't matter if I said I wasn't referring to you?

 

[Mary Pats BOB]

Scared of the POB! b!^@h.

 

[The Dude]

Scared of the POB! b!^@h.

Whoa, hey. Hey, whoa.

 

[Decked]

Scared of the POB! b!^@h.

Nope, try again. Calling a 16-17 year old kid a b!^@h for not choosing our school is inexcusable.

 

[C N Red]

This thread has become good.

Also, i find it funny how some of you dont think you have biases. You know who you are, you holier than thou members.

No, maybe you should point them out. People saying they haven't used racist epitaphs aren't claiming they have no biases.

You must be one of them. I am referring to the posts talking of biases and people using possible slurs in private talk between friends/family and some people act as though they never have. Ever referred to anyone as redneck, wetback, fence climber, hick, cracker, told a racial joke, laughed at a racial joke, etc. We all have our biases and have let things slide or just went along with it so as not to be singled out in our circle of family and friends. If any one says they havent then i too will call BS.

Again this is being widened, as it was with Coach. Now it's not using racial slurs. It's letting them slide, going along with them, having biases. I've never used a racial slur. But I didn't call my grandparents out for using the N word. I just stopped talking.There are people out there who exist who've never used racial slurs. This isn't that radical of a claim.

Hey, you're the one who took my post as meaning racial slurs. I clearly said bias. Just saying, dont twist the post to use as a basis for something i didnt say.

And you're the one who still hasn't pointed out who was acting "holier than thou" before my reply. No one claimed they don't have biases. The claim I saw was people saying they didn't use racist words or jokes.

You're clueless if you cant see it. Nothing more. Cant argue with ignorance.

 

[Elf]

How many other ADs have picked two coaches in a row that posted .700+ records?

I reported this post for stupidity. Hahahahaha!

 

[JJ Husker]

Isn't it possible that the universe was created by a higher being but that being does not interact with his creation?

The Bible records a lot of interaction wt His creation - especially through the life of Jesus Christ. I believe He was the "First Cause" behind creation. He established the physical & moral laws by which the universe operates.

I know it does. But the bible is fictional. I am talking about if there truly was a God.

Well this is real f'n productive. How about it you don't want to have a reasonable, civil discussion about this that you just stay out of the discussion? Thanks in advance for not continuing to be a d!(k.

Interesting...I laid out a scenario where God didn't interact with his creation and it was ignored by TGH because he only wanted to present his version of God. So then I relay my outlook and I am a d!(k?

Actually, you are the one being a douche here. Sorry everyone hasn't conformed to your arrogant way of looking at things.

I don't ask that you conform to any specific way of thinking. I don't care if you believe in God or not. I don't care if you believe the words of the Bible or not. What I would ask however is that you refrain from stating as fact that the Bible is fictitious or that God does not exist. You made those comments only to inflame the discussion with TG or any other person who you know believes differently than you. You're a liar if you claim otherwise.

You don't believe, that is fine with me. Go ahead and state as much. But, if you continue to be purposely inflammatory, then yeah, You're going to called out for being a d!(k. Probably nothing too new to you anyway, so don't get your panties in a bunch.

 

[Moesker]

Isn't it possible that the universe was created by a higher being but that being does not interact with his creation?

The Bible records a lot of interaction wt His creation - especially through the life of Jesus Christ. I believe He was the "First Cause" behind creation. He established the physical & moral laws by which the universe operates.

I know it does. But the bible is fictional. I am talking about if there truly was a God.

Well this is real f'n productive. How about it you don't want to have a reasonable, civil discussion about this that you just stay out of the discussion? Thanks in advance for not continuing to be a d!(k.

Interesting...I laid out a scenario where God didn't interact with his creation and it was ignored by TGH because he only wanted to present his version of God. So then I relay my outlook and I am a d!(k?

Actually, you are the one being a douche here. Sorry everyone hasn't conformed to your arrogant way of looking at things.

I don't ask that you conform to any specific way of thinking. I don't care if you believe in God or not. I don't care if you believe the words of the Bible or not. What I would ask however is that you refrain from stating as fact that the Bible is fictitious or that God does not exist. You made those comments only to inflame the discussion with TG or any other person who you know believes differently than you. You're a liar if you claim otherwise.

You don't believe, that is fine with me. Go ahead and state as much. But, if you continue to be purposely inflammatory, then yeah, You're going to called out for being a d!(k. Probably nothing too new to you anyway, so don't get your panties in a bunch.

 

[Moesker]

Isn't it possible that the universe was created by a higher being but that being does not interact with his creation?

The Bible records a lot of interaction wt His creation - especially through the life of Jesus Christ. I believe He was the "First Cause" behind creation. He established the physical & moral laws by which the universe operates.

I know it does. But the bible is fictional. I am talking about if there truly was a God.

Well this is real f'n productive. How about it you don't want to have a reasonable, civil discussion about this that you just stay out of the discussion? Thanks in advance for not continuing to be a d!(k.

Interesting...I laid out a scenario where God didn't interact with his creation and it was ignored by TGH because he only wanted to present his version of God. So then I relay my outlook and I am a d!(k?

Actually, you are the one being a douche here. Sorry everyone hasn't conformed to your arrogant way of looking at things.

I don't ask that you conform to any specific way of thinking. I don't care if you believe in God or not. I don't care if you believe the words of the Bible or not. What I would ask however is that you refrain from stating as fact that the Bible is fictitious or that God does not exist. You made those comments only to inflame the discussion with TG or any other person who you know believes differently than you. You're a liar if you claim otherwise.

You don't believe, that is fine with me. Go ahead and state as much. But, if you continue to be purposely inflammatory, then yeah, You're going to called out for being a d!(k. Probably nothing too new to you anyway, so don't get your panties in a bunch.

How is what TG did any different from what I did? How is it any less inflammatory? I stated a version of God that didn't interact with humanity and he basically said that wasn't possible because: the bible.

In the end, we both said the other was wrong because...

You just don't like it because I spoke out against your version of God. Why don't you criticize people from stating the bible is fact or that God exists? People you are a small little boy who doesn't like those who think differently.

And I didn't try to inflame but I don't care if I do simply for having a different opinion. Again, was TG trying to inflame by shooting down my theory?

 

[JJ Husker]

Isn't it possible that the universe was created by a higher being but that being does not interact with his creation?

The Bible records a lot of interaction wt His creation - especially through the life of Jesus Christ. I believe He was the "First Cause" behind creation. He established the physical & moral laws by which the universe operates.

I know it does. But the bible is fictional. I am talking about if there truly was a God.

Well this is real f'n productive. How about it you don't want to have a reasonable, civil discussion about this that you just stay out of the discussion? Thanks in advance for not continuing to be a d!(k.

Interesting...I laid out a scenario where God didn't interact with his creation and it was ignored by TGH because he only wanted to present his version of God. So then I relay my outlook and I am a d!(k?

Actually, you are the one being a douche here. Sorry everyone hasn't conformed to your arrogant way of looking at things.

I don't ask that you conform to any specific way of thinking. I don't care if you believe in God or not. I don't care if you believe the words of the Bible or not. What I would ask however is that you refrain from stating as fact that the Bible is fictitious or that God does not exist. You made those comments only to inflame the discussion with TG or any other person who you know believes differently than you. You're a liar if you claim otherwise.

You don't believe, that is fine with me. Go ahead and state as much. But, if you continue to be purposely inflammatory, then yeah, You're going to called out for being a d!(k. Probably nothing too new to you anyway, so don't get your panties in a bunch.

How is what TG did any different from what I did? How is it any less inflammatory? I stated a version of God that didn't interact with humanity and he basically said that wasn't possible because: the bible.

In the end, we both said the other was wrong because...

You just don't like it because I spoke out against your version of God. Why don't you criticize people from stating the bible is fact or that God exists? People you are a small little boy who doesn't like those who think differently.

And I didn't try to inflame but I don't care if I do simply for having a different opinion. Again, was TG trying to inflame by shooting down my theory?

Nevermind. I'll just go back to ignoring you. I should trust my instincts enough to know there was a good reason you ended up on that list in the first place.

 

[Moesker]

Isn't it possible that the universe was created by a higher being but that being does not interact with his creation?

The Bible records a lot of interaction wt His creation - especially through the life of Jesus Christ. I believe He was the "First Cause" behind creation. He established the physical & moral laws by which the universe operates.

I know it does. But the bible is fictional. I am talking about if there truly was a God.

Well this is real f'n productive. How about it you don't want to have a reasonable, civil discussion about this that you just stay out of the discussion? Thanks in advance for not continuing to be a d!(k.

Interesting...I laid out a scenario where God didn't interact with his creation and it was ignored by TGH because he only wanted to present his version of God. So then I relay my outlook and I am a d!(k?

Actually, you are the one being a douche here. Sorry everyone hasn't conformed to your arrogant way of looking at things.

I don't ask that you conform to any specific way of thinking. I don't care if you believe in God or not. I don't care if you believe the words of the Bible or not. What I would ask however is that you refrain from stating as fact that the Bible is fictitious or that God does not exist. You made those comments only to inflame the discussion with TG or any other person who you know believes differently than you. You're a liar if you claim otherwise.

You don't believe, that is fine with me. Go ahead and state as much. But, if you continue to be purposely inflammatory, then yeah, You're going to called out for being a d!(k. Probably nothing too new to you anyway, so don't get your panties in a bunch.

How is what TG did any different from what I did? How is it any less inflammatory? I stated a version of God that didn't interact with humanity and he basically said that wasn't possible because: the bible.

In the end, we both said the other was wrong because...

You just don't like it because I spoke out against your version of God. Why don't you criticize people from stating the bible is fact or that God exists? People you are a small little boy who doesn't like those who think differently.

And I didn't try to inflame but I don't care if I do simply for having a different opinion. Again, was TG trying to inflame by shooting down my theory?

Nevermind. I'll just go back to ignoring you. I should trust my instincts enough to know there was a good reason you ended up on that list in the first place.

Tell me how it is different? Enlighten me. It should be easy.

 

[Red Dead Redemption]

That Hindu dude in Mumbai that you could have been - he feels the same way about you. With the same conviction, and the same lack of evidence or proof that his god is even real.

 

[secretasianman]

Some very delicate souls on this board. No doubt about that.

Are you always a whiny little b itch?

Remind me of my damn spoiled little step sister .

Tough -talkin e-thug . Go back to winking at yourself in the mirror while you splash on some Stetson .

 

[cm husker]

Some very delicate souls on this board. No doubt about that.

Are you always a whiny little b itch? Remind me of my damn spoiled little step sister .

Tough -talkin e-thug . Go back to winking at yourself in the mirror while you splash on some Stetson .

That's weird.