Offending Posts Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh f#&% off.   His story is sad and it sucks for his family. My wife and I know exactly how he feels as we lost a child to miscarriage between #3 and #4 in 2012.  My wife still brings it up at times.    My sister had to deliver a known would be stillborn.   His story is sad but not unique and pointing out other sad situations that can be resolved through adoption is not being a d!(k.   The heartache couples that can’t have children is really and long lasting too.  Pointing out adoption resolves some of that heartache isn’t being a d!(k.  
 

if @funhuskertook offense to the way it came across I would apologize for that but not the content.  
@Archy1221 you are nothing more than words on my screen.  I wouldn’t give two s#!ts if you never posted here again.  I’m sure you feel the same.  
 

So in your own words, “oh f#&% off”. You aren’t worth getting pissed at.  ;)

 
Oh f#&% off.   His story is sad and it sucks for his family. My wife and I know exactly how he feels as we lost a child to miscarriage between #3 and #4 in 2012.  My wife still brings it up at times.    My sister had to deliver a known would be stillborn.   His story is sad but not unique and pointing out other sad situations that can be resolved through adoption is not being a d!(k.   The heartache couples that can’t have children is really and long lasting too.  Pointing out adoption resolves some of that heartache isn’t being a d!(k.  
 

if @funhuskertook offense to the way it came across I would apologize for that but not the content.  
Dude, step away from the keyboard for 5 minutes. Your advice wasn’t solicited, in fact he preemptively stated he wasn’t interested in that course of action. Your reply to him was out of line. Period.

BTW, my wife also had a miscarriage years ago. Most of the people we know have had one. It’s not that uncommon. But because of Roe v Wade we didn’t have to be concerned about the DNC procedure being treated like a crime or as a government hoop to jump through. Now get over yourself.

 
In your dogged defense of all things conservative, you're asking us to to prove something you know doesn't exist - yet. Needless to say, your argument of "if it doesn't exist right now, it won't ever in the future" isn't very strong. 


I still remember when Republicans told Democrats that legalizing gay marriage would be a slippery slope to normalizing pedophilia. Wonder who was right about that one.

 
I figured you didn't know, because none of the articles said who it was. They tried to imply it was Kerry, but if they knew they would have said.

At this point it's fair to doubt the veracity of any of those articles. Nothing in that memo "undermined" the cheeto.
Ask the question in a non douche way, you might get more give and take  :dunno

 
Do what Orange Man Bad did.  
Sad but anticipated response. That seems to be your answer for everything, not because orange man actually did anything good or sensible but rather because you are A) ignorantly convinced otherwise and/or B) you prefer a President and party who; cater to only the rich and scum like Putin as long as it serves to fill their own pockets, and possibly subscribe to the misguided belief that black and brown people are detrimental to a supremely white and Christian ‘Merica.

So which is it, you’ve been severely ill informed and are ignorant and/or you’re just as big of a s#!thead as Trump and the current Repugnant party? Really, those are the only two possible choices at this point in time.

 
@Undone What, did you think I meant that Frost went on 10/11 News after the Minnesota game and presented his plan? He presented it to Alberts, dumbass.

 
Presenting yet another editorial from the honorable https://jonathanturley.org/ Totally impartial, and definitely mentally stable source. 

I know I hate that a federal investigation is being done without disclosing every fact to the general public. Lord knows how many investigations are going on, but we should probably put all potential defendants on notice with the known evidence we have against them.

I don't know how you think anyone can take you seriously when you post this kind of stuff, but you've managed to do it for years now. Must be exhausting to spend so much time and effort justifying your endorsement of evil.

 
Presenting yet another editorial from the honorable https://jonathanturley.org/ Totally impartial, and definitely mentally stable source. 

I know I hate that a federal investigation is being done without disclosing every fact to the general public. Lord knows how many investigations are going on, but we should probably put all potential defendants on notice with the known evidence we have against them.

I don't know how you think anyone can take you seriously when you post this kind of stuff, but you've managed to do it for years now. Must be exhausting to spend so much time and effort justifying your endorsement of evil.
Turley is a nationally known and respected professor of Law :dunno

His take on leaking info during an investigation trying to frame the argument is unethical at best.   If Trump is guilty, then try him in court not through the media.    

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top