OU to get the sanctions today at 2:00 p.m. central time

[Axl_sued_me]

So our are 2005 Huskers now 9-3? chuckleshuffle

LOL.....that also means that the throat slashing incident never happened. So BC was telling the truth.

 

[lapaesl]

1. Forfeit all wins in 2005 (8) meaning they were 0-12 in '05

Doesn't it just mean they were 0-0? I thought they "cleared" the 05 records, rather than forfeit each game. That would be overkill.

Actually I'm now hearing that the wins are viewed as they have never happened and OU's record for 2005 is 0-4 instead of 8-4.

 

[BIGREDFAN_in_OMAHA]

1. Forfeit all wins in 2005 (8) meaning they were 0-12 in '05

Doesn't it just mean they were 0-0? I thought they "cleared" the 05 records, rather than forfeit each game. That would be overkill.

Actually I'm now hearing that the wins are viewed as they have never happened and OU's record for 2005 is 0-4 instead of 8-4.

Stoops' win total has been amended to 78-19 from the previous 86-19 so 0-0 would appear correct for the season tally.

 

[adc7236]

A 2-year bowl ban? That sounds insanely harsh. For what?

Whenever I hear about NCAA sanctions, I feel the need to go *cough* USC *cough*

COUGH COUGH....USC is above the law it appears.

 

[lapaesl]

1. Forfeit all wins in 2005 (8) meaning they were 0-12 in '05

Doesn't it just mean they were 0-0? I thought they "cleared" the 05 records, rather than forfeit each game. That would be overkill.

Actually I'm now hearing that the wins are viewed as they have never happened and OU's record for 2005 is 0-4 instead of 8-4.

Stoops' win total has been amended to 78-19 from the previous 86-19 so 0-0 would appear correct for the season tally.

actually 0-4 because is losses stayed the same, just the wins were taken away.

 

[BIGREDFAN_in_OMAHA]

1. Forfeit all wins in 2005 (8) meaning they were 0-12 in '05

Doesn't it just mean they were 0-0? I thought they "cleared" the 05 records, rather than forfeit each game. That would be overkill.

Actually I'm now hearing that the wins are viewed as they have never happened and OU's record for 2005 is 0-4 instead of 8-4.

Stoops' win total has been amended to 78-19 from the previous 86-19 so 0-0 would appear correct for the season tally.

actually 0-4 because is losses stayed the same, just the wins were taken away.

Good point.

 

[billdozer15]

1. Forfeit all wins in 2005 (8) meaning they were 0-12 in '05

Doesn't it just mean they were 0-0? I thought they "cleared" the 05 records, rather than forfeit each game. That would be overkill.

Actually I'm now hearing that the wins are viewed as they have never happened and OU's record for 2005 is 0-4 instead of 8-4.

Stoops' win total has been amended to 78-19 from the previous 86-19 so 0-0 would appear correct for the season tally.

actually 0-4 because is losses stayed the same, just the wins were taken away.

Good point.

So technically we went 8-3 in 05'? That should take Callahan of the hot seat right? :sarcasm I went to that 05 OU vs. Neb game, great game except the interception for a touchdown and hold that occurred right in front of the ref that allowed AP to score. I thought we were going to win but ZT just overthrew Nate Swift on a long bomb.

 

[BIGREDFAN_in_OMAHA]

1620 just got official word back from the NCAA that this does not benefit any of the other teams from Oklahoma's schedule that year so Nebraska's record does not change.

 

[huskerfan500]

no teams benefit from the wins taken away

 

[billdozer15]

no teams benefit from the wins taken away

If a win was taken away from one team how can the loss count agianst another? Shouldn't it be like the game never occurred?

 

[Overland Park Husker]

1. Forfeit all wins in 2005 (8) meaning they were 0-12 in '05

Doesn't it just mean they were 0-0? I thought they "cleared" the 05 records, rather than forfeit each game. That would be overkill.

Actually I'm now hearing that the wins are viewed as they have never happened and OU's record for 2005 is 0-4 instead of 8-4.

Stoops' win total has been amended to 78-19 from the previous 86-19 so 0-0 would appear correct for the season tally.

actually 0-4 because is losses stayed the same, just the wins were taken away.

Good point.

So technically we went 8-3 in 05'? That should take Callahan of the hot seat right? :sarcasm I went to that 05 OU vs. Neb game, great game except the interception for a touchdown and hold that occurred right in front of the ref that allowed AP to score. I thought we were going to win but ZT just overthrew Nate Swift on a long bomb.

So they not only cheated off the field they cheatd on it. Bastards.

(I dont think AP scored on that either....that allowed them to go for it on 4th and 1 instead 4th and 13....they scored a couple plays later, if I'm thinking of the same non-holding call that I you're talking about).

 

[billdozer15]

1. Forfeit all wins in 2005 (8) meaning they were 0-12 in '05

Doesn't it just mean they were 0-0? I thought they "cleared" the 05 records, rather than forfeit each game. That would be overkill.

Actually I'm now hearing that the wins are viewed as they have never happened and OU's record for 2005 is 0-4 instead of 8-4.

Stoops' win total has been amended to 78-19 from the previous 86-19 so 0-0 would appear correct for the season tally.

actually 0-4 because is losses stayed the same, just the wins were taken away.

Good point.

So technically we went 8-3 in 05'? That should take Callahan of the hot seat right? :sarcasm I went to that 05 OU vs. Neb game, great game except the interception for a touchdown and hold that occurred right in front of the ref that allowed AP to score. I thought we were going to win but ZT just overthrew Nate Swift on a long bomb.

So they not only cheated off the field they cheatd on it. Bastards.

(I dont think AP scored on that either....that allowed them to go for it on 4th and 1 instead 4th and 13....they scored a couple plays later, if I'm thinking of the same non-holding call that I you're talking about).

Yeah i think we are thinking of the same one. It allowed AP to get around the end. I was in the North endzone and could see it from there, clear at the other end of the field.

 

[BIGREDFAN_in_OMAHA]

NCAA worded that Oklahoma "vacated" the wins rather than forfeited.

 

[PIMPZILLA]

The NCAA blew this one. Not showing any love for OU, but this is ridiculous. What about Reggie Bush???? What ever happened to that issue? Why not make an example out of the Heisman winner and National Champs????

 

[SoonerOLB]

The NCAA blew this one. Not showing any love for OU, but this is ridiculous. What about Reggie Bush???? What ever happened to that issue? Why not make an example out of the Heisman winner and National Champs????

\
We are appealing this one

http://soonersports.com/sports/m-footbl/sp.../071107aaa.html

The National Communist Against Athletes has been pissed off at OU since we sued them in the 80's to negociate our own TV contracts.

F'them..The nancy boy who handed down the penelties is the AD of Miami Co-Canes.

We self-reported ourselves..We need to get some of our Oil-rich alums and sue the livin' feces out of them.

gOU Big Red