Points Forced & Points Allowed

StPaulHusker said:
KJ-You owe me a +1 for calling the correct winners on games 2 and 3 against Indiana. Quit ducking me.
Click to expand...
My apologies! I forgot all about that. I thought for sure the bullpen was going to sneak into the decision one of the days.

Now take this +1 and go buy yourself something nice. You earned it.

 
KJ. said:
Bye Bye Big XII said:
The odds of every game ending in a loss is the same as the odds of every game ending in a win. They're opposite sides of the same coin.
Click to expand...
You're going to need to clarify this. Do you mean for any randomly generated team? I might agree with you there. I haven't looked at the historical spread. But that isn't at all what this discussion is about, so I'm assuming you mean for a specific team. And that would be 100% wrong.

Bye Bye Big XII said:
And our disagreement is probably due to the "scope" of how we're wishing to make these predictions. I think you're going from a more holistic approach and seeing that a) we've overachieved according to the PF-PA differential and the projection for wins and predicting b) that we're going to eventually underachieve, which isn't what we want.

I'm taking a more specific approach and treating each season as separate from the season before because I think there are so many extraneous variables that factor into wins and losses that can not be controlled, so we can't look any further than just one year.
Click to expand...
For starters, I never said or implied the bold comment. I was talking about regression toward the mean, which is entirely different.

The disagreement lies in the fact that your second paragraph is just not true. Are you honestly telling me that the result from last season - a season against likely the same teams, with about 75% the same rosters - is completely uncorrelated to the result of the next season?
Click to expand...
Not at all. Obviously, playing against the same teams with mostly the same roster is going to produce the same result, if everyone who comes back to the team improved by the same amount in the off-season, and the new players to the team are of the same skill level. While the correlation is probably there, I'm not sure how strong it is.

I get what you're saying now, that as sample size increases the distribution approaches normal, about the mean.

What I was saying in that first paragraph is that, all things about each team being equal, the chances of every game being a win are are the same of every game being a loss.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Where would you like to see our average at this year?

I'd like to see our PF jump up a couple points per game. As for the defense, I'd imagine it would stay somewhere around 28 points, but the optimist in me thinks we'll decrease that by a couple points.

 
Mills said:
Where would you like to see our average at this year?

I'd like to see our PF jump up a couple points per game. As for the defense, I'd imagine it would stay somewhere around 28 points, but the optimist in me thinks we'll decrease that by a couple points.
Click to expand...
I'd say offense ticks up to 38.3 and defense stays about the same.

 
Back
Top