Guy - no offense meant, but I think you are reading a revisionist history of the Reagan years or did not know or have forgotten (I don't know your age) the threat to democracy we had worldwide under the Soviet threat. Reagan wasn't perfect and in an era of peace it is easy to pick any administration apart - esp 40 years removed from that history.
The division we are seeing now was totally not imaginable during the time of Reagan - who didn't mind having a drink with the Democratic House leader. There are many reasons top historians have placed Reagan in the top 10 realm of presidents and linking him to the trumpian, Neanderthal, fascist world of today's GOP is not one of those reasons.
But I think we can go to the scorched earth campaign of GHWB run by Lee Atwater and we start seeing a bit more of what you are talking about. Jump that up a notch with
Newt. After the GOP got a taste of power, owning the House after 38 years, then we start seeing more issues that led to deeper divisions. But even at that, the Tea Party and then Trump himself took it to a whole new level.
For the record, I cast my first vote in the 1980 Presidential Election. I didn't vote for either Reagan or Carter. I understand the last 50 years pretty well.
I totally get the nostalgic preference for Reagan, and that he would, in fact, be a huge improvement over Trump and a comforting presence in today's White House. Yes, he presided over a more congenial and collaborative Congress, but so did his predecessors and successors, with everyone sharing drinks till roughly the Obama administration.
When I accuse Reagan of mythologizing it's because that was his great skill. Carter had inherited the massive bill and loss of prestige from the Vietnam War, and was horribly out of step with Washington. People craved Reagan's vision of The City on the Hill and he gave them a terrific performance and sense of optimism. Plenty of good things sprung from that.
But when it came to actual policy, Reagan and his administration took a top-down supply side approach to almost everything. Yes, “the seven most feared words in America” was a fun takedown of the big government mommy state, but the deregulation and gutting of social services under Reagan set the course for homelessness and mental health issues that we decry today, in addition to hugely favoring the already wealthy and powerful who – it turned out – had no intention of letting anything trickle down, accepting huge government incentives/exemptions while abandoning our labor force for other countries. If you look at the growing division of the haves and have nots in America, it all traces back to the Reagan years.
https://www.mic.com/articles/104612/7-charts-show-why-trickle-down-economics-has-been-an-enormous-failure
(https://www.mic.com/articles/104612/7-charts-show-why-trickle-down-economics-has-been-an-enormous-failure)
So to me, the “clarity” Reagan provided were the real simple things we wanted to hear, and because he appealed to the better nature of Americans, it sounded much better than the partisan rancor being pedaled today. But behind the scenes it was the beginning of a lasting division.
And with all due respect to standing up to Russia (we held all the cards on that one) those Reagan administration foreign policy scandals could hold their own with any recent administration. That Reagan team also set a disastrous foreign policy course that influential conservative think tanks still follow today, despite nothing turning out as they predicted.
Interesting and unanswerable question: if pre-presidential Ronald Reagan was in today’s GOP, would he be a voice of reason in his quest to be President, or would he have migrated like other Republicans to stances and rhetoric similar to party standard bearer Donald Trump?